Himachal Pradesh Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Principal, C.R. College of Pharmacy, Karnataka and Another Vs. Lalit M ...
Court: Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
Oral: Surjit Singh, President: 1. Appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 18.11.2011, of learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hamirpur, whereby a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, filed against them by respondents Lalit Mohan and Om Prakash, has been allowed and they have been ordered to refund the amount of Rs.1,53,720/, allegedly charged by them from the respondents, on account of fees and other expenses for Pharmacy Diploma Course of two years duration, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum, and also to pay Rs.10,000/- as punitive compensation and Rs.5,000/- on account of costs. 2. Respondents filed a complaint, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, alleging that for the session 2002-04 respondent Lalit Mohan was charged a sum of Rs.1,53,720/- and the money was paid by his father Om Prakash, respondent No.2. It was pleaded that at the end of the session, Lalit Mohan was deputed to undergo practical training at C....
Hardev Singh and Another Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
Surinder Singh, J. (Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. The appellants were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, in short the Act, for allegedly transporting 1500 grams of poppy husk in Maruti Car No. PB-11 H-0427 and each of them was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in case of default of payment of fine, they were sentenced to further undergo imprisonment for one month. 2. The appeal was admitted for hearing on 10.1.2007. The sentence imposed on the appellants, hereinafter referred to as the accused, was suspended vide order dated 2.2.2007. 3. In short, the prosecution story can be stated thus. In the year 2002, PW-1 Head Constable Ghanshyam was posted in Police Station, Sarkaghat. On 5.7.2002 at Kainchi Mod (Bhambla) at about 2.30 p.m., the above stated white coloured maruti car came from Mandi side. It was signaled to spot, but howeve...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›