Skip to content

Himachal Pradesh Court February 2005 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 25 2005

The Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. ...

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-25-2005

Reported in: AIR2005HP39

ORDERK.C. Sood, J. 1. Plaintiff, the Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (plaintiff corporation for short) is a Company, incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office in Shimla. Plaintiff corporation has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs. 1,02,90,191/- with future interest against the defendants. Defendant No. 1 M/s. Continental Spinners Ltd. (hereinafter referred as Company) is a Company, incorporated under the Companies Act. Defendant Nos. 2 to 5 are the guarantors to the Company.2. Case of the Plaintiff Corporation is that the Company applied for term loan of Rs. 60,00,000/- (Sixty lacs) for construction of building, purchase of land, plant, machinery and other assets for setting up a Worsted Spinning Unit at Barotiwala, in District Solan of Himachal Pradesh. The loan was sanctioned to the defendant Company on 11-10-1995. The defendants agreed to pay interest at the rate of 18.5% with half yearly rests on the loan amount....


Feb 17 2005

State of H.P. Vs. Ishwar Dass and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-17-2005

Reported in: 2006CriLJ46

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. The State of H. P. has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 31-7-1995 passed by learned Special Judge, Hamirpur in Corruption Case No. 3 of 1989. By the Impugned judgment and order, the learned Special Judge has acquitted the respondents for the offences under Sections 204, 218, 409, 411, 467, 468, 471, 477, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short I. P. C.) and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Sections 5, 6 and 10 of Prevention of Specific Corrupt Act, 1983.2. The prosecution case was that Ishwar Dass respondent No. 1 herein was posted as Store Keeper in Irrigation and Public Health (I. P. H.) store at Didwin Tikker, Sub-Division Barsar in the year 1986, Karan Singh-'Pathania-respondent No. 2 was posted as Junior Engineer in Chakmoh section of I. P. H. Sub-Division Barsar and PW-27 Rajinder Kumar, Junior Engineer was its incharge. Dev Raj-respondent No. 3 was the contractor and a cement dealer. In the year 1986 some project in 'Deo...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial