Himachal Pradesh Court June 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Paras Marketing Company and anr. Vs. Ruchira Papers Ltd.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2003
Reported in: I(2004)BC372
M.R. Verma, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereafter referred to as 'the Code') has been preferred by the petitioners/accused (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioners') for quashing Criminal Complaint No. 122 of 2001, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereafter referred to as 'the Act').2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition are that the respondent/ complainant (hereafter referred to as 'the respondent' has filed a complaint against the petitioners under Section 138 of the Act. After recording preliminary evidence, the learned trial Magistrate directed issue of summons to the petitioners who put in appearance pursuant to the summons. Aggrieved by the summoning order and consequent issue of summons to them, the petitioners have preferred the present petition for quashing the complaint as well as further proceedings therein on the ground that the complaint does not make out a case against the petitioner...
Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corp. Vs. Mehar Chand and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-11-2003
Reported in: 2003ACJ1912
R.L. Khurana, J.1. One Nek Ram of about 20 years of age, son of respondent No. 1 Mehar Chand had died during the course of his employment with respondent No. 2 Jai Singh who was working on behalf of appellant H.P. State Forest Corporation in Tehsil Jwali, District Kangra. Respondent No. 1 approached the Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation Act (for short 'the Act') for the grant of compensation in respect of his deceased son. According to respondent No. 1, as per the claim laid by him before the Commissioner under the Act his son Nek Ram had died while in active employment of the respondent No. 2 Jai Singh and the appellant H.P. State Forest Corporation. The deceased is alleged to have sustained injuries as a result of fall of pine tree on his person while he was working in the Forest. Compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,00,000 was demanded. The respondent No. 2 Jai Singh the contractor did not put in appearance before the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation. The appellant, H.P. Fo...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›