Himachal Pradesh Court April 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Kishan and 2 ors. Vs. State of H.P.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-07-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALT(Cri)10,II(2003)DMC424
M.R. Verma, J.1. Since these three applications Under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure {hereafter referred to as 'the Code') for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners/accused (hereafter referred to as 'the accused persons') arise out of the same F.I.R. No. 46 dated 31.3.2003 Under Section 498-A/406, I.P.C. registered at Police Station Balachour, District Nawashehar (Punjab), therefore, are being disposed of by this common order.2. Brief facts leading to the presentation of these applications, as set out in the applications, are that accused Ashok Kumar and Lakhvinder Kaur were married on 29.1.1998 at Balachour. After the marriage attitude of Lakhvinder Kaur became aggressive and she started pressing accused Ashok Kumar that he must live separately from his parents accused Prakasho Devi and Ram Kishan either at Chandigarh or at Nawashehar. On refusal of accused Ashok Kumar the aggressive attitude of Lakhvinder Kaur hardened and she started harassing, humiliati...
Pyar Chand Vs. Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-07-2003
Reported in: 2003ACJ1249
Arun Kumar Goel, J. 1. Both these appeals are filed against the award passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Shimla in M.A.C. Case No. 43-S/2 of 1994 dated 23.2.1996. We propose to dispose of these appeals by this common judgment.2. In F.A.O. No. 131 of 1996 appellant, (hereinafter referred to as 'the claimant'), wants the compensation to be enhanced, whereas in F.A.O. No. 356 of 1996 the appellants (hereinafter referred to as 'the H.R.T.C. and driver'), want the award to be set aside and thus exonerating them from the payment of compensation awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal to the claimant.3. Admitted facts as those emerge from the records of the learned Tribunal below are that bus bearing registration No. HP 07-1097 of H.R.T.C. was being driven by its driver on 27.11.1993. It was on its way from Shimla to Junga. It met with an accident at a place known as Suinta. The bus went down the road. Number of persons were injured and there were two casualties also. Claim...
H. P. State Forest Corporation Ltd. Vs. Cit and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2003
Reported in: [2004]267ITR285(HP)
V.K. Gupta C.J.Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn our attention to page 6 of the memo of appeal filed under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, wherein at para. 8, the following three substantial questions of law have been formulated by the appellant. We quote .'(a) Whether the notice issued for imposition of penalty under section 273(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, authorised the assessing officer to impose the penalty under any other section, i.e., section 273(2)(aa) of the Act (b) Whether penalty can be imposed under section 273(2)(aa) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without the issue of show cause notice for the same (c) Whether the Honble Tribunal was justified in coming to the conclusion that the mention of section 273(2)(a) in place of section, i.e., 273(2)(aa) of the Income Tax Act was not material at all as the assessee was given reasonable opportunity of being heard before imposition of penalty and further holding that the assessee would not have furnished a di...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›