Himachal Pradesh Court March 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of H.P. Vs. Bhim Singh and Company
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-06-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ3223
Kuldip Chand Sood, J.1. This petition under Sections 397, 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure arises out of the orders of the learned Sessions Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan dated 19th July, 2001.2. It appears, on 13th April, 2001 one truck No. HP 18-4524 was found stationed in front of liquor shop L-14 at Naina Tikar. That truck was checked by the Excise Inspector Kuldeep Kumar and it was found that the truck was loaded with 600 boxes of Country Liquor (Sirmaur No. 1), Excise Inspector Kuldeep Kumar telephonically informed the police. On the receipt of the message, police officials came to Naina Tikar. Six hundred boxes of the liquor found in the truck, were taken into possession. The driver of the truck could not produce any document, permit or pass to carry such liquor. It was the case of the prosecution that the driver could only produce four passes for transporting 325 boxes. It was the further cases of the prosecution that this liquor was being illegally...
Dr. Ranjit Mal Kastia and anr. Vs. Registrar of Companies
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-06-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ3394
ORDERM.R. Verma, J.1. This petition is directed against the order dated 18-9-2001 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solan whereby the delay in filing a complaint under Section 207 of the Companies Act, 1956 by the respondent/complainant (hereafter referred to as the 'respondent') against the petitioners/accused (hereinafter referred to as the 'petitioners') has been condoned and the petitioners have been ordered to be summoned on the basis of the complaint.2. The brief and undisputed facts leading to the presentation of this petition are that the respondent instituted a complaint against the petitioners under Section 207 of the Companies Act, 1956 in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. Solan and an application for condonation of delay of two years four months in filing the said complaint was also filed. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate by the impugned order condoned the delay in filing the complaint but without notice to the petitioners.3. I have hea...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›