Himachal Pradesh Court June 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manbhari Devi and Etc. Etc. Vs. State
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-30-2000
Reported in: 2001CriLJ70
ORDERKuldip Chand Sood, J.1. All these 13 applications under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are being disposed of by this common order as all of them arise from a case FIR No. 257/2K for the offences punishable under Section 20/27-A/29/32 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Drugs Act') registered with the Police Station, Kullu, on 1-7-2000. The applicants are resident of Village Tosh, P.O. Barashiani, Tehsil and District Kullu (H.P.)2. In order to appreciate the respective contentions of the applicants and prosecution, the facts as disclosed in the First Information Report may be noticed in brief:On the early morning of 1st June, 2000, ASI Kanwar Singh, Incharge, Police Post Manikaran, received a secret information that Datti Ram S/o Alam Chand r/o village Tosh deals in the sale of Charas at large scale and on immediate raid Charas can be recovered from his house. ASI Kanwar Singh reduced the information received by...
Smt. Leela Alias Bali Devi Vs. Smt. Drumti Devi
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-2000
Reported in: AIR2002HP7
Kuldip Chand Sood, J. 1. This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure arises out of the Judgment and decree of learned District Judge, Mandi. Kullu and Lahaul Spiti Districts at Mandl. H. P. dated May 31, 1993. Smt. Drumti Devi plaintiff and defendant Leela alias Ball Devi, appellant herein, are the daughters of Shri Dilu son of Shri Rattan of village Baniur. Tehsil Chachiot of District Mandi. Shri Dilu died on 3rd of Bhadon 2042 Bk. after prolonged illness. Defendant Leela alias Ball Devi claims the entire property left by Shri Dilu on the basis of a registered Will executed by Shri Dilu in her favour on March 25. 1985. Plaintiff Drumti filed a suit for declaration that the Will executed by Shri Dilu in favour of defendant No. 1 is invalid, null and void and not binding on the interests of the Plaintiff on the properties left by Shri Dilu as detailed in para 1 of the plaint with consequential relief restraining the defendant Smt. Leela alias Bali Devi from forci...
Amit Bhardwaj Vs. H.P.S.E.B. and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2000
Reported in: (2001)ILLJ241HP
Kamlesh Sharma, J. 1. In this writ petition the petitioner is aggrieved by order dated September 15, 1998 passed by the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal whereby his Original Application No. 1767/1996 has been dismissed having no merit. His Original Application was against the rejection of his representation by the respondent Board vide order dated October 17, 1996 (Annexure P-3).2. This case has a chequered background. In short it is that the petitioner who holds Diploma of Tracer-cum-Draftsman (Civil) was engaged as Junior Draftsman on daily wage basis against vacancy in exigency of work and on compassionate grounds for a period of 89 days, at the rate prescribed by the Board vide letter dated December 16, 1994 (Annexure P-3 to CWP No. 2014 of 1995). He joined on: December 22, 1994 and on March 20, 1995 he was told that his services were no longer required w.e.f. March 20, 1995. Feeling aggrieved, he filed CWP No. 2014 of 1995, which came for admission on October 19, 1995 befo...
Ranbir Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-23-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ5063
ORDERR.L. Khurana, J. 1. The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as the accused, stands convicted by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nahan, for the offences under Sections 468, 471 and 473, Penal Code, vide judgment dated 20-12-1997 in case No. 33/2 of 1994. Upon such conviction, he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and fine of Rs. 500/- on each of the three counts. In default of payment of fine, he has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months on each count. All the three substantive sentences of imprisonment were ordered to run concurrently.2. The conviction and sentence imposed upon the accused by the learned Magistrate were affirmed in appeal by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nahan, on 8-9-1998.3. Feeling aggrieved, the accused has come up before this Court by virtue of the present revision petition under Sections 397 and 401, Cr, P.C., assailing the conviction and sentence imposed upon him by the tw...
Neeraj Acharya Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-22-2000
Reported in: AIR2001HP7
C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. This petition is filed by the petitioner directing HimachalPradesh Board of School Education, respondent No. 3 herein, to consider the candidature of the petitioner under the category of physically handicapped for admission to Junior Basic Training ('JBT' for short) two years Course, on the basis of entrance examination held in 1999 and lor consequential directions.2. It was the case of the petitioner that on 4th June, 1997, he suffered a blast injury in his right eye. He was immediately taken to Civil Hospital, Kangra from where he was referred to AIIMS (RP Centre) New Delhi, where he was operated in July 1997 and a certificate was issued by the Senior Medical Superintendent on 21st July, 1997. The certificate shows visual impairment disability to the extent of 30 per cent.3. According to the petitioner, applications were invited by the third respondent-Board for admission to JBT Course and the last date for submission of application forms was 10th May, 1999, The ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›