Skip to content

Himachal Pradesh Court February 2000 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 23 2000

Himachal Road Transportcorporation and anr. Vs. Bimla Devi and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-23-2000

Reported in: II(2000)ACC380,2000ACJ959

Kuldip Chand Sood, J.1. The award made by learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (II), Sirmaur District Camp at Solan, Himachal Pradesh is under challenge in this appeal and cross-objections.2. Sunil Kumar, son of respondent Manohar Lal, a student of class VIII, died in an unfortunate motor accident, which took place at village Salogra of Tehsil and District Solan on 13.8.91. At the relevant time, Sunil Kumar (deceased) was travelling in bus No. HP-18-3501. When this bus arrived at Salogra, it was stopped for passengers to alight. When Sunil Kumar was alighting from the bus, its driver suddenly, unmindful of the fact that passengers were getting down from the bus, started the bus. Sunil Kumar fell down and was crushed under the tyres. He was shifted to the hospital at Solan where he succumbed to the injuries.3. The bus is owned by the Himachal Road TransportCorporation respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 is the Regional Manager of thisCorporation. The bus was being driven, at the relev...


Feb 22 2000

State of H.P. Vs. Edward Samual Chareton

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-22-2000

Reported in: 2001CriLJ1356

M.R. Verma, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment, dt. 29-8-1998 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kullu and Lahaul Spiti Division at Kullu, whereby the respondent-accused (hereafter referred to as 'the accused)' has been acquitted of a charge under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the State has preferred the present appeal.2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 18-11-1996 at about 2.40 p.m., when ASI Baldev Singh (PW 16) along with PW 9 Prem Singh, HHG, HC was on patrol duty in Manali bazar, he received a secret information that Edward Samual, the accused, was dealing in 'Charas' and even at that time he was leaving bus stand Manali along with his luggage and 'Charas' could be recovered from his possession. On receipt of this information, Baldev Singh, ASI constituted a raiding party consisting of Kahan Singh (PW 15) and Jiwan Sood (PW 14). Then he drew up a 'Ruqua' Ext. PD and sent the same to Poli...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial