Skip to content

Himachal Pradesh Court September 1997 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 23 1997

Atma Ram Vs. Rameshwari Devi and anr.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-23-1997

Reported in: I(1999)DMC248

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. In order to properly appreciate the respective submissions urged by the learned Counsel, it is necessary to notice a few facts relevant for determination of this case.3. It is not in dispute that Atma Ram (hereinafter referred to as the 'husband'), is married to Rameshwari Devi (hereinafter referred to as the 'wife') and Pinku (hereinafter referred to as the 'son') is the son of the said parties. Besides the son, parties have another son Gian Singh and Ms. Kamla, a daughter and both these children are admittedly residing with the husband. Case of the wife in proceedings under Section 125, Cr.P.C. was that her husband, his brother Daulat Ram and his sister Bimla as well as the mother of the husband often beats her and a criminal case was filed in that behalf against Daulat Ram which was compromised. Besides this, it was further claimed by the wife that she had been turned out of her matrimonial house by her husband, his brot...


Sep 08 1997

Sakina and anr. Vs. Salim Khan

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-08-1997

Reported in: I(1998)DMC684

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. Petitioners have filed this revision petition against the order dated 3.8.1992, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Chamba Division at Chamba. By means of impugned order maintenance granted in favour of the petitioner No. 1 was set aside, whereas maintenance granted to minor daughter Razina Begum of parties viz. Salim Khan and Sakina in the sum of Rs. 100/- p.m. has been upheld. This petition has been filed by both mother and daughter (hereinafter referred to as the 'petitioners') for grant of maintenance to mother by setting aside the impugned order to that extent and by modifying the same and thus enhancing the amount of compensation awarded from Rs. 100/- p.m. to Rs. 200/- p.m. to minor daughter Razina Begum.2. In order to understand the case in its right perspective, a few facts need to be noticed which are to the following effect:Salim Khan and Sakina were admittedly husband and wife and they had three children from their wedlock. One is admittedly dead, anothe...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial