Himachal Pradesh Court June 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Des Raj Vs. Mehar Singh and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-30-1997
Reported in: AIR1999HP21
Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. Plaintiff has filed this appeal against the judgment passed by District Judge, Hamirpur. whereby the dismissal ot' his suit for declaration etc., has been upheld.2. Suit was filed hy the plaintiff lor declara-tion to the effect that sale deed registered on 20-6-1973 at Hamirpur as well as Mutation No. 244 daled 29-3-1975 in respect of land measuring 8 kanals 19 marlas situate in Tika Kangru, Mauja Ugialta. Tehsil and District Hamirpur executed by Jaswant Singh defendant No. 2 father of the plaintiff in favour of Mehar Singh, defendant No. 1 is null and void as well as inoperative because it was made without legal necessity. Defendant No. 2 was alleged to be a drunkard and woman-iser. According to the plaintiff there was no necessity much less legal necessity for the sale having been effected, besides this defendant No. 2 was pleaded to be a person having sufficient means as well as having landed and house property. It was also pleaded that the parties being Rajput...
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Sher Khan
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-24-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ563
ORDERArun Kumar Goel, J. 1. I have heard the learned Assistant Advocate General and have also gone through the record of the case.2. The State is aggrieved by the acquittal of the respondent ordered by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class (II), Nurpur. By means of impugned judgment passed in Criminal case No. 878/1 of 1988 134/III of 1991 dated28-2-1992, respondent has been acquitted of the offences under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').3. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 27-7-1988, CW-1, Food Inspector, C.B. Sharma was at Nurpur and was checking the milk of the milk vendors. Respondent on checking was found to have come to Nurpur for the sale of milk that he was carrying in the Can. It was tested with Electo-meter and the same was found to be sub-standard. In these circumstances, the said Food Inspector informed the respondent of his intention to take the sample out of the milk, being carried by th...
Ajay Medical Agency Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-1997
Reported in: [1998]233ITR413(HP)
M. Srinivasan, C.J.1. In these two writ petitions, the petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Commissioner of Income-tax rejecting the claim of the petitioner for the benefit of Section 273A with reference to the assessment years 1976-77, 1979-80, 1980-81, 1981-82 and 1982-83. The facts pertaining to those assessment years are almost the same. It was found by the Income-tax Officer that the returns filed by the assessee for those relevant years did not contain the correct particulars and he opined that there was a deliberate concealment of income by the asses-see to an extent of Rs. 1,22,843.77. He issued a notice on August 10, 1983, calling upon the assessee to give an explanation before August 20, 1983. Thereafter, the assessee filed a revised return on March 13, 1984, admitting the factum of the particulars being incorrect, but gave an explanation for such incorrect particulars. According to him, the discrepancies in the particulars occurred on account of certain valid reasons a...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›