Himachal Pradesh Court May 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deep Ram Vs. Himachal Road Trans. Corpn.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-27-1992
Reported in: I(1993)ACC75,1992ACJ1089
V.K. Mehrotra, J.1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties further today and feel that, in the circumstances of the present case, the finding recorded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Solan to the effect that the case was not a fit one for condoning the delay in the presentation of the claim petition deserves to be set aside.2. Deep Ram, appellant, was travelling in a bus of the H.R.T.C. bearing registration No. HIE 72 along with his wife from Bilaspur to Kotla. This was on February 4, 1988. An accident took place near Danoghat. In it Deep Ram sustained a number of injuries. The driver of the bus also died in it.3. After remaining in the hospital at Shimla for about 11 days, Deep Ram was discharged on February 15, 1988. The case of Deep Ram is that he remained unconscious for a period of about 5 days after the accident. Several injuries, which are mentioned in the discharge slip (marked 'X'), were found on the person of Deep Ram for which treatment was given to him.4. The...
Kashmiri Lal Vs. Arya Samaj Mandir, Subathu
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-08-1992
Reported in: AIR1993HP28
ORDER1. Respondent-landlord, namely, Arya Smaj Mandir, Subathu, through its President, sought the petitioner's eviction from a residential set comprising one room, kitchen, varandaha, latrine and bathroom located in the ground floor of House No. 337, Chowk Bazar, Subathu on two grounds: non-payment of arrears of rent and the same being required by it for its own use as accommodation for school and office. The arrears of rent were tendered on the first date of hearing and as such the first ground did not survive. In respect of the second ground, the Rent Controller found that the premises were, in fact, required bona fide by the respondent for running a school and on that basis an order of eviction against the petitioner was passed. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner preferred an appeal, which was also dismissed by the Appellate Authority. These two orders, passed on 9th June, 1988 and ll th January 1990, respectively, by the Rent Controller, Solan and Appellate Authority, Solan, are und...
Shiv Ram and anr. Vs. Sheela Devi
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-1992
Reported in: AIR1993HP49
ORDERDevinder Gupta, J.1. Petitioners have in this petition filed under Section 24(5) of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 (Act No. 25 of 1987) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) sought the setting aside of an order passed on 29th October 1990, by the Appellate Authority, Hamirpur, dismissing their appeal and thereby confirming the order passed on 20th January, 1988 by the Rent Controller, Hamirpur.2. Eviction of tenant-petitioner No. 1 from the premises in question was sought by the landlady-respondent on three grounds:(1) he being in arrears of rent at the rate of Rs. 150/- per month (2) he having sub-let the premises without the written consent of the landlady in favour of his son, petitioner No. 2, and (3) the tenanted premises having been subjected to conversion of user from banana store to trunk manufacturing and sale thereof and that too without the prior permission or consent of the landlady. The Rent Controller found the rate of rent to be Rs. 55/- per month ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›