Himachal Pradesh Court April 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Village Papers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-28-1992
Reported in: (1993)ILLJ99HP
Leila Seth, C.J.1. I have had the advantage of reading the judgments of both my learned brothers, which they are about to deliver. Since the various decisions of the Supreme Court and the High Courts as well as the provisions of law and the facts have been dealt with in detail in the said judgments, I do not intend to repeat them. However, the following conclusions can be culled out from the various decisions and provisions.1. A mere demand made to the Government cannot become an industrial dispute without it being raised by the workmen with their employer.2. If such a demand is made to the Government it can be forwarded to the management and if rejected, becomes an industrial dispute.3. Though it is apparent that for a dispute to exist there must be a demand by the workmen on the employer, this demand need not be in writing, unless the matter pertains to a public utility service, in view of the provisions of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.4. The demand need not be sen...
Sh. B.S. Thind and Etc. Vs. State of H.P. and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-06-1992
Reported in: 1992CriLJ2935
ORDERKamlesh Sharma, J.1. Both these Criminal Revisions are being disposed of by a common judgment as these arise out of the same order dated 31st October, 1991 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla, in application No. 66/2 of 1991 but the documents on the file of Criminal Revision No. 109 of 1991 will be referred to.2. A case F. I. R. No. 21 dated 16th January, 1991 under Section 120B IPC, Section 13(d)(1)(ii) & (iii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Sections 8(c) and 9(c) of the H.P. Prevention of Specific Corrupt Practices Act, 1983, Police Station, Enforcement, South Zone, Shimla, was registered against M/s. Shimla Engineers and Builders, 9, 1st Floor Lower Mall, Shimla, and Ors., Petitioner, Sh. B. S. Thind, presently working as Deputy Inspector General of Police, Enforcement, South Zone, Shimla, took up the investigation of the case and on 17th January, 1991 caused search to be made through his the then Superintendent of Police, Sh. Gurbaksh Singh of the premises...
Kailash Nath Sood and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-1992
Reported in: AIR1993HP37
V.K. Mehrotra, J.1. The H. P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1979 (Act No. 9 of 1980) (briefly, 'the Act') was enacted to 'provide for the establishment of Municipal Corporation for certain cities in the State of Himachal Pradesh'. It came into force on October 18, 1980. Section 4 provides for constitution of a Corporation.2. Om Parkash Sood and one more resident of Shimla, both registered voters in the electoral rolls for the Shimla Assembly Constituency, approached this Court through C.W.P. No. 210 of 1984 for a direction in the nature of mandamus to the State to establish a Corporation for Shimla after holding a general election therefor. This Court directed the State to constitute the Shimla Municipal Corporation on or before May 30, 1985. The order is reported as Om Parkash Sood v. State of H. P., ILR 1984 HP443 : (AIR 1985 HP 53). The matter was taken to the Supreme Court by the State. The Supreme Court disposed it of on April 23, 1985 in Civil Appeal No. 2071 of 1985. The time for c...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›