Himachal Pradesh Court November 1990 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Kishan and ors. Vs. Kanwar Papers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-1990
Reported in: [1992]73CompCas77(HP)
Devinder Gupta, J.1. This application has been moved by the respondent-applicant with a prayer to stay the proceedings in the main appeal pending completion of enquiry under the provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (Act No. 1 of 1986) (briefly 'the Act').2. It is averred in the application that the applicant-company is covered by the provisions of the Act and has become a sick company. The board of directors of the company had made a reference to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction constituted under the Act for determination of the measures required to be adopted with respect to the company. It is also averred that the reference has since been registered as Case No. 163 of 1989 with the Board and proceedings for enquiry into the working of the company under Section 16 of the Act are pending before it, and, therefore, in view of the provisions of Section 22 of the Act, proceedings in the appeal deserve tobe stayed.3. The applicatio...
H.P. State Small Industries and Export Corporation Vs. Export Credit a ...
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-12-1990
Reported in: AIR1992HP17
1. One of the issues directed to be tried as a preliminary one vide order dated October 3, 1988 pertains to as to 'whether this court has no territorial jurisdiction to try the suit'.2. The plaintiff-Corporation, a public limited company with the approval of the defendant, but subject to the former coverage under the Comprehensive Risks Policy (shortly hereinafter referred to as the 'Policy') in the sum of Rs. 40 lakhs provided cash credit limit facility to a firm of Ludhiana in the year 1977. The said firm pursuant to agreements entered into with various firms in Nigeria, had exported bicycle parts to the latter.3. As per the allegations of the plaintiff-Corporation, the defendants were liable to losses vis a vis the aforesaid supply of bicycle parts under certain terms of the policy referred to above to the extent of 90% thereof, whereas defendants admitted their liability and consequently paid the sum towards the liquidation of the losses to the extent of 60% only. The suit pertains...
Gopal Chand and ors. Vs. Ram Sarup
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-12-1990
Reported in: AIR1992HP11
Devinder Gupta, J.1. This Regular Second Appeal has arisen out of the judgment and decree passed on July 30, 1982, by Additional District Judge, Solan and Sirmaur Districts at Solan, dismissing the appeal of defendants-appellants and thereby confirming the judgment and decree of Sub-Judge 1st Class, Nalagarh, dated January 9, 1980, decreeing the suit of the plaintiff-respondent.2. The plaintiff filed a suit claiming a decree for declaration to the effect that he was in possession of land measuring (a) 46 kanals 15 marlas situate in village Rajpura, Tehsil Nalagarh and (b) 35 kanals 2 marlas situate in village Rangoowal in Tehsil Nalagarh as a tenant under defendants-appellants and that the order passed on July 6, 1977 by the Land Reforms Officer, Nalagarh, in proceedings initiated by defendants under Section 30 of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972 (Act No. 8 of 1974) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was illegal, void, without jurisdiction and ineffective and i...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›