Himachal Pradesh Court August 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Parveen Singh Vs. Kanchana Devi
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-1989
Reported in: I(1990)DMC24
Bhawani Singh, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of District Judge, Kangra, in H.M.A. No. 79 of 1983 decided on 27-3-1985 thereby dismissing the petition of the appellant under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for the dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce or in the alternative under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act for the grant of judicial separation. The appellant has a grievance against this judgment, therefore, he assails it by way of this appeal.2. The facts, in brief, are that the marriage was solemnised between the parties on 1-3-1978 at Village Tikeri Dukhi in Tehsil Palampur according to Hindu rites. The appellant complained that there was no cohabitation with the respondent and when the respondent came to his house in October, 1978, the respondent was pregnant from some person other than the appellant. On October 20, 1978, the respondent complained stomachache and the mother of the appellant took her to Civil Hospital, Nurpur, where the do...
S.K. Bhatia and anr. Vs. Jaspal Singh Mann and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-1989
Reported in: I(1990)ACC34,1990ACJ13
Bhawani Singh, J.1. The claimants are the father and mother of Rakesh Bhatia who died on account of an accident that took place on 30.1.1972 two kilometers from Kandaghat on Kalka-Shimla road. They feel aggrieved by the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 15.1.1982 which allowed an amount of Rs. 5,000/- as compensation against their claim for Rs. 2,00,000/-.2. The allegation is that the deceased was a pillion rider with respondent No. 1 on motor cycle UPM 7737. It was owned by respondent No. 2 and was being driven by respondent No. 1 who was going from Shimla to Karnal. The accident, it is alleged, took place due to the negligence of respondent No. 1 which fact is contested. It is asserted that respondent No. 1 took the motor cycle unauthorisedly and without the permission and knowledge of respondent No. 2 who is the father of respondent No. 1. On driving and speed, it is alleged that the same was normal and cautious. As to the injury, it is alleged that while respondent...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Usha Rani and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-1989
Reported in: 1990ACJ785
Bhawani Singh, J. 1. These appeals with Cross-objections [FAO.(MVA) No. 80 of 1981, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Usha Rani with Cross-objections No. 3 of 1982 and FAO. (MVA) No. 90 of 1981, Pishori Lal v. Usha Rani with Cross-objections No. 4 of 1982] arise out of the same accident and common award, therefore, they are being taken up for decision together.2. The facts, in brief, are that Ram Karan, aged 24%, of village Naina Tikkar died in a truck accident on 2.8.1977 at about 11.30 p.m. on Rajgarh-Solan Road. The deceased was in truck No. HRE 2697 while the same was loaded with goods and vegetables belonging to the deceased and a few others. The same were to be carried from the Rajgarh area of Sirmaur District to Delhi. The truck met with an accident resulting in the death of the deceased and one other person although a few others sustained injuries. A claim petition for Rs. 1,50,000/- was filed before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Solan, by the claimants and it was alleged ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›