Himachal Pradesh Court September 1988 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Sudarshan Kumar and Etc.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-30-1988
Reported in: 1989CriLJ1412
V.P. Bhatnagar, J.1. The determination of these cases requires close scrutiny of the various provisions, particularly those relating to procedure contained in Chapter V of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'Narcotic Act').2. Here, brief reference may be made at the very outset to the facts of Cr. Rev. No. 106 of 1987 and Cr. Rev. No. 121 of 1987.3. The first Criminal Revision No. 106 of 1987 is directed against the order dated August 11, 1987 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Una, whereby he declined to frame a charge-sheet against the accused on the facts placed before him. Briefly stated, the prosecution case was that S.H.O., Babu Ram received a secret information on December 1, 1985 that accused Sudarshan Kumar was carrying on sale of opium at his house and that opium in large quantity could be recovered from his house. On the following morning, he associated three independent witnesses with the raiding party and went to the Sudershan Kumar's ho...
Gian Chand Vs. Mani Karan and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-1988
Reported in: [1989(58)FLR360],(1990)ILLJ565HP
P.D. Desai, J.1. The appellant is the workman and the respondents are his employers within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The appellant claims to have sustained personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment at about 5 P.M. on 3rd January, 1987. The injury, according to the medical opinion, has resulted in the partial traumatic amputation of his left hand. The percentage of disability, as per the medical certificate, is 50%, but this is not admitted by and on behalf of the appellant who claims that the amputation has resulted in permanent total disablement and consequential loss of earning capacity to the extent of 100%2. It appears that when the parties appeared for the first time before the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Dalhousie (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commissioner'), their statements were recorded. The respondents at that time admitted all the material facts gi...
Miss Pooja Uppal and ors. Vs. Himachal Pradesh Board of School Educati ...
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-1988
Reported in: AIR1989HP72
V.K. Mehrotra, J.1. These three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution relate to the grievance of some students who appeared in the matriculation examination conducted by the Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education in the month of March, 1988. The petitions were clubbed together, for the purpose of hearing, at the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioners in these cases. When the petitions were presented in this Court, the respondent Board was called upon to put in its reply. It did so in each of the petitions. The petitioners have also filed their affidavits-in-rejoinder in each of them. We may, however, notice that the facts on the basis of which the principal arguments have been addressed before us in C.W.P. No. 355 of 1988 were brought on the record of that petition through a Civil Misc. Petition (978 of 1988). The version of the respondent-Board was placed before this Court in that petition in its reply filed in this Civil Misc. Petition. The rejoind...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›