Himachal Pradesh Court November 1988 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kanwar Partap Singh Vs. Smt. Minakshi Devi and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-1988
Reported in: AIR1990HP8
V.P. Bhatnagar, J.1. The short question which requires determination in this civil suit, seeking declaration with consequential relief, is whether it has been correctly valued for the purposes of court fees within the ambit of Section 7 of the Himachal Pradesh Court-fees Act, 8 of 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Court-fees Act) or not.2. Briefly stated, plaintiff Kanwar Partap Singh's case, as made out in the plaint, is that the suit property known as Hira House along with the adjoining land situate in Shimla was inherited by his father, late Raja Dalip Singh of Dhami, from his (plaintiff) grand father, late Raja Hira Singh of Dhami. Raja Dakip Singh died on May 8, 1987 leaving behind his son (plaintiff) and three daughters (defendants Nos. 1 to 3). According to the plaintiff, it was a coparcenary property and he became owner of half share therein _by_ birth. It is further averred by him that the remaining half share belonging to Raja Dalip Singh was to be inherited equally by the...
State Bank of Patiala Vs. Hypine Carbons Ltd. (In Liquidation) and ors ...
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-1988
Reported in: AIR1990HP10
ORDER ON ISSUE NO. I : The first defendant Hypine Carbons Ltd. (in liquidation was established at Nalagarh in the State of Himachal Pradesh to carry on the business of producing, processing of activated carbon and bye-products thereof. At the request of the first defendant. State Bunk of Patiala sanctioned and granted some credit limits to it in pursuance of an agreementdt. Dec. 18, 1972. This agreement was reviewed and the necessary documents renewed from time to lime.2. The first defendant was supplying its manufactured products, which were hypothecated with the Bank, to various parties with direction to make payment directly to the Bank. Hundies used to be drawn by these parties which used to be discounted to the Bank.3. A petition for the winding up of the first defendant (being Company Petition No. 1 of 1977) was moved in this Court by M/s. Kuldip Industrial Corporation. This Court, while admitting the petition, appointed a Provisional Liquidator for the first defendant under Sect...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›