Himachal Pradesh Court May 1986 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-23-1986
Reported in: 1988CriLJ438
R.S. Thakur, J.1. This order will dispose of two Contempt Petitions (Criminal) Nos. 7 and 8 of 1985, whereby the Court has suo motu initiated proceedings in criminal contempt against the State of Himachal Pradesh and its employees mostly belonging to the Police and posted at Dharmsala. Karam Singh respondent No. 2 and Himmat Ram respondent No. 3 in Contempt Petition (Cr.) No. 7 of 1985 and Bai Chand and Parveen Kumar, respondents Nos. 2 and 3 respectively, in Contempt Petition (Cr.) No. 8 of 1985 at the relevant time were posted as constables at Dharamsala, whereas R. S. Pathania and Jaswant Monga, respondents Nos. 4 and 5 respectively ,were posted as Superintendent of Police and Deputy Superintendent of Police respectively in District Kangra at Dharmsala. M. L. Nahar, respondent No. 6 was General Assistant to the Deputy Commissioner Kangra at Dharmsala later on re-designated as Assistant Commissioner to the Deputy Commissioner, Kangra.2. The proceedings in Contempt Petition (Cr.) No. ...
Fitta Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-22-1986
Reported in: 1987CriLJ1379
ORDERR.S. Thakur, J.1. This is a jail appeal filed by the appellant Fitta, hereinafter referred to as the accused, challenging the order of conviction passed against him by the Sessions Judge, Kangra Division camp at Chamba, on December 3, 1984, for the offence under Section 376 of the Penal Code, sentencing him to, undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years.2. The prosecution case before the trial court was that one Smt. Bhutto wife of Abhiya Ram and the accused Fitta belong to two neighbouring villages Patnehar and Chanohta respectively at a distance of about one k.m. front each, other, (probably the village Pantehar is a part of village Chanohta). On May 19,1984, said Bhutto along with other young children of her village like Jarmo and Km/Meenki etc. went to grate their respective cattle in the nearby jungle known as Kunahal At about mid-day, the cattle of the companion graziers of said Smt. Bhutto strayed away and they all then went to bring them back except said Smt....
Dr. Rattan Chand Dogra Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-06-1986
Reported in: AIR1987HP17
ORDERT.R. Handa, J. 1. The Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., respondent No. 5, is a society registered under the Himachal Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, hereinafter called the Act. A vacancy on the Board of Directors of this Bank which is its governing body for the purposes of the Act, arose which pertained to Hamirpur zone of the society. It may be observed that for the purposes of election to its governing body, this society had been divided into various zones. The vacancy referred to above was required to be filled by election which was to be conducted in accordance with the election rules found at Appendix 'A' to the Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules, 1970, hereinafter called 'the Rules'.2. In order to conduct such elections, the Managing Director of respondent No. 5 had drawn up detailed programme of election, a copy of which is found at Annexure-A. Invitations were also given to the eligible candidates to file their nomination papers to contest this elec...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›