Himachal Pradesh Court October 1985 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Badri Nath Kapoor
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-28-1985
Reported in: AIR1987HP86
V.P. Bhatnagar, J. 1. This regular First Appeal has been preferred against judgment dt/- Aug. 24, 1974 of the learned District Judge, Solan and Sirmur Districts at Solan whereby he partly accepted the reference made under Section 18 of the Land Acquisiton Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) enhancing the amount of compensation from Rs. 5429.15 p to Rs. 13435/-, thus allowing an enhanced amount of compensation to the tune of Rs. 8005.85P to the claimant. Aggrieved from the aforesaid judgment, the State of Himachal Pradesh has preferred the present appeal. 2. The facts of this case are that a notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued on Oct. 13, 1970 with respect to land measuring 9 biswas and a building constructed thereon. This property was required for the widening of Kalka-Shimla Road. The land is situate in village Datyar near Delhi, Tehsil Solan. 3. The Land Acquisition Collector allowed a sum of Rs. 225/- towards the cost of the land measuring 9 biswas, a sum of Rs. ...
Negi Ram and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-1985
Reported in: 1986CriLJ1228
ORDERR.S. Thakur, J.1. This criminal revision petition is directed against the appellate order passed by the Sessions Judge, Kangra Division, Camp at Chamba dated Nov. 24, 1984, whereby the appeal of the revisionists Negi Ram and his son Baldev Raj against their conviction under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for contravening the provisions of the Himachal Pradesh Hoarding and Profiteering Prevention Order, 1977, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Prevention Order') was dismissed. The setence, however, was modified to the extent that the period of imprisonment of six months against each of the revisionists, as imposed by the trial court, was reduced to three months each.2. The two revisionists were, at the material time, running a 'kariyana' shop in village Tarvai, Pargana Tissa, Tehsil Churah, District Chamba, in the name and style of M/s. Negi Ram and Baldev Raj. On Dec. 13,4981, Amin Chand who at that time was posted as Inspector Food...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›