Himachal Pradesh Court July 1984 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dev Ashish Bhattacharya Vs. Punjab National Bank and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-1984
Reported in: (1986)ILLJ98HP
P.D. Desai, C.J.1. Rule. To be heard today.2. Mr. R.L. Sood, waives service of the Rule.3. Pursuant to his selection through the Banking Services Recruitment Board (Delhi Group), the petitioner was appointed as clerk-cum-cashier in the respondent-bank under a letter dated 11th November, 1983 (Annexure P-l) and was posted at the Mandi Branch of the respondent-bank where he joined duty on 21st November, 1983. On 17th April, 1984, the services of the petitioner were terminated on the grounds set out in the termination order of even date (Annexure P-2). The petitioner challenged the termination order by instituting Civil Writ Petition No. 170 of 1984. The petition came on for preliminary hearing before this Court on 8th May, 1984 when the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-bank made a statement that the termination order would be withdrawn and that the petitioner would be reinstated in service forthwith with liberty reserved to the respondent-bank to proceed against him in a...
Hans Raj Dhir Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-17-1984
Reported in: 1985CriLJ1030
P.D. Desai, C.J.1. An application received by one of us (Chief Justice) was registered as a writ petition. The application was made by a retired employee of the State Government who was at the time of his retirement working in the office of Settlement Officer, Consolidation, Hamirpur in the capacity of a clerk.2. On April 28, 1969, the petitioner was placed under suspension. The services of the petitioner were terminated on Feb. 3, 1971. The order of termination was challenged in Civil Writ Petition No. 61 of 1971 : Reported in ILR (1974) Him Pra 296 which was decided in favour of the petitioner on Mar. 15,1974 by a learned single Judge of this Court by quashing the termination order and giving a further direction to the effect that 'the petitioner shall be deemed to have continued in service right from the date the impugned order was passed' and that 'he shall also be entitled to all consequential benefits arising as a result of the quashing of the order.'3. The decision of the learne...
Nawal Thakur Vs. Brahmu Ram
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-10-1984
Reported in: 1985CriLJ244
P.D. Desai, C.J.1. The petitioner's allegation that his two co prisoners are being required to carry buckets of water to the residences of the Jail Officers is admitted in the affidavit in-reply. It has been admitted that Amar Singh and Keshav Ram, who are undergoing sentences of rigorous imprisonment have been detailed to supply water to the quarters occupied by the Jail Officers Reliance has been placed in the said affidavit upon the provisions of Para702 read with the Explanation to Para 703 of the Superintendence and Management of Jails in the Punjab, as applicable to Himachal Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as 'the ManuaD, in order to justify the services being taken accordingly from the two prisoners.2. Para 702 of the Manual reads as under :Small detachments of the sweeper and water-carrier gangs may be permitted to clean out and supply water to the quarters occupied by jail officers (except those of the Superintendent), twice a day ; each house shall be visited in turn and the...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›