Himachal Pradesh Court March 1984 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
income-tax Officer Vs. Rama Nand and Co. and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-27-1984
Reported in: [1987]163ITR702(HP)
Handa, J.1. Respondents Nos. 1 to 9 are the partners of the firm in respondent No. 10, M/s. Rama Nand & Co., which is an assessee under the Income-tax Act (hereinafter called 'the Act'). The petitioner, Income-tax Officer, Central Circle, Chandigarh, filed nine different complaints under Section 276B read with Section 194C of the Act against the respondents in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla, pertaining to different assessment years alleging therein that the respondents had violated the provisions of Section 194C of the Act by' failing to deduct tax at source out of the payments made by them to certain sub-contractors named in the complaints and had thus rendered themselves liable for punishment under Section 276B of the Act.2. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate observed that the respondents were not 'contractors' nor the persons to whom payments are alleged to have been made by them 'sub-contractors' within the meaning of Section 194C of the Act and as such they ...
Darshan Singh Sethi Vs. Shimla Municipal Corporation, Shimla
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-1984
Reported in: AIR1984HP77
P.D. Desai, C.J.1. The petitioner, who owns an immoveable property in Shimla, was served with an order dt. Mar. 16, 1984 passed by the Municipal Commissioner, Shimla, under Section 268 of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation Act') directing him to remove certain unauthorised construction detailed in the said order within three days from the date of the receipt of the order and further intimating that in the event of the petitioner's failure to carry out the direction, further action would be taken in accordance with law. The said order, against which an appeal lies to the Court of the District Judge, Shimla. was served on the petitioner on the evening of Mar. 16, 1984. The petitioner preferred such appeal on Mar. 19, 1984 along with an application for stay. According to the petitioner, the learned District Judge was out of station and he was not likely to return till the end of the month and, under those circumstances, the Co...
Jindu and ors. Vs. Mahant Ram
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-1984
Reported in: AIR1985HP25
ORDERT.R. Handa, J.1. The present revision petition filed under Section 115, C. P. C., has arisen in the following circumstances.2. On the allegations that they were the owners of an area of agricultural land measuring 8-1 bighas and comprised in Khasra Nos. 758/1 and 759/1 situate in village Kot, Pargna Ajmerpur, Tehsil Ghumarwin, and had mortgaged the same with possession in favour of the respondent for a consideration of Rs. 500A the petitioners herein filed a suit against the respondent for possession of the suit land by redemption. The respondent contested that suit. The various pleas raised by the respondent would be apparent from the following issues which were struck by the trial Court on the pleadings of the parties :1. Whether relationship of mortgagor andmortgagee exist between the parties quathe suit property? O.P.P. 2. What is the mortgage money? O.P.P. 3. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled toredeem the suit property on paymentof Rs. 500/- ?O.P.P. 4. Whether the defendant...
Dr. Naresh Kumar Varmani, Etc. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-12-1984
Reported in: AIR1984HP66
V.P. Gupta, J.1. All these writ petitions can conveniently be disposed of by a common judgment as almost common questions of law and facts are involved in all of them. The facts of each petition are, however, being narrated separately.C. W. P. No. 309 of 1983.2. The petitioner in this case passed his M. B. B. S. examination in the year 1980 from the Himachal Pradesh University and did his house job in the Discipline of Orthopaedics from 1981 to 1982 in the Snowdon Hospital, Shimla. Post-graduate Degree and Diploma Courses are held in Himachal Pradesh Medical College, Shimla. For these courses there are several Disciplines, as mentioned in the Prospectus of the Medical College. One of the pre-requisites for admission is that the person should hold an M.B.B S. Degree from Himachal Pradesh University. The admission is on the basis of an open competitive examination to be conducted by the Himachal Pradesh University for different subjects. According to the prospectus and the averments in t...
Brooke Bond Tea India Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-06-1984
Reported in: 1984CriLJ1201
ORDERT.R. Handa, J.1. In all these five petitions, the petitioners seek the quashing of the criminal proceedings initiated against them and others under Section 7 read with Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') at the instance of the Government Food Inspectors and which proceedings are presently pending in different Subordinate Courts. The main ground urged in support of all these petitions being the same, it is considered expedient to dispose of all these petitions by this common order.2. Three of these petitions, namely, Criminal Revisions Nos. 78 to 80 of 1979 are at the instance of M/s. Brooke Bond India Limited Calcutta, a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act and engaged in the manufacture and sale of tea under the trade name of 'Brooke Bond'. Samples of Brooke Bond tea marketed by this petitioner were taken by the Food Inspectors from the various dealers/vendors who have been impleaded as respondents i...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›