Himachal Pradesh Court May 1983 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.C. Dogra and Etc. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-23-1983
Reported in: AIR1984HP29
ORDERV.P. Gupta, J.1. These three writ petitions can conveniently be disposed of by a single judgment, as questions of facts and law involved in these writ petitions are similar.2. For understanding the facts and the matters in controversy the facts of Civil Writ Petition No. 276 of 1981 are being stated.The petitioners are carrying on the business of mining operations, in the name and style 'M/s. Dogra Stone Crusher' in village Chhakdal. District Simla. They were getting short term permits under Rule 24 of the Himachal Minor Minerals (Concession) Revised Rules. 1971 hereinafter called 'Rules') and were depositing royalty, etc. for this purpose.3. The petitioners applied for a short term permit on 22nd Sept. 1981 but this permit was not issued. The petitioners now allege that the land upon which they were carrying on business is the ownership of their father and uncle, who have allowed the petitioners to occupy the land for working mining operations. Under Article 300A of the Constitut...
Seth Sunder Parshad and Sons, New Delhi Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-10-1983
Reported in: AIR1984HP9
ORDERV.P. Gupta, J.1. M/s. Seth Sunder Par-shad and Sons contractors (Plaintiff) agreed to execute some work for the construction of Government residential accommodation Quarters at Kasumpti, Simla, vide agreement No. 6 entered into between the plaintiff and the State of Himachal Pradesh (defendant). The work order was issued to the plaintiff in Sept/ October, 1973, and the plaintiff in accordance with the terms of the agreement constructed the quarters.2. In the agreement under Clause 25 all questions and disputes arising out of or relating to the contract were to be decided by an arbitrator to be appointed by the Chief Engineer. Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department.3. Disputes arose between the partiesA and they were referred to the arbitration of Shri O.P. Sablok Superintending. Engineer. H.P.P.W.D. The arbitrator entered on the reference on 30th June. 1977 and gave hip award on 27th Feb.. 1978.4. The arbitrator filed the award inthis Court on 1st July. 1978 with aprayer that th...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›