Himachal Pradesh Court April 1977 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jai Singh and ors. Vs. Lala Ganesha and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-25-1977
Reported in: AIR1977HP69
ORDERR.S. Pathak, C.J.1. This and the connected revision petition arise out of two appeals filed by the petitioners against the grant of injunctions in two suits in favour of the respondents. 2. It appears that a suit was filed by the petitioners for declaration and in-junction in the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge, Sarkaghat with respect to certain parcels of land. It was alleged that by an ex parte order in partition proceedings initiated by the respondents an order for partition had been obtained by them and that they were attempting to disturb the possession of the petitioners in the land in suit. An application was also made by the petitioners in that suit for the grant of an interim injunction, and on Oct. 10, 1975 the learned Subordinate Judge made an order requiring the parties to maintain the status quo. He specifically found that it was not possible to hold which of the parties was in possession of the disputed land, but observing that it was necessary to maintain the...
Jaimal Singh Lachman Singh Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-13-1977
Reported in: AIR1977HP70
ORDERChet Ram Thakur, J.1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner firm which deals in forest contracts. Thepetitioner in Sept. 1974 had purchased the right to fell bamboos in forest lot No. 1/74-75 in Kunihar Forest Division in an open auction for Rs. 4,25,000. The area which was auctioned was about 100 acres. The working period of the lease was up to 30-4-1975. The forest authorities granted permission for felling the trees only after about a month of the sanction of the lease. By March 1975, the petitioner could fell trees only from an area of 200 acres. The total out-put worked out was about 500 truck loads. Out of that the petitioner could export only 27 truck loads. By March they had paid an amount of Rs. 2,56.250, The petitioner could not export the entire output due to certain difficulties and therefore requested the respondents to permit them to export the remainder part after the expiry of the working period ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›