Skip to content

Himachal Pradesh Court December 1976 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 27 1976

Kanshi Ram Vs. Bansi Lal

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-27-1976

Reported in: AIR1977HP61

R.S. Pathak, C.J.1. This review petition prays for the recalling of our judgment and order dated June 19, 1974 allowing a revision petition.2. The petitioner is the landlord of a shop in Solan. He applied under Section 13 of the Bast Punjab Urban Rent RestrictionAct for the eviction of the respondent-tenant from the shop. On July 29, 1970 the Controller passed an order of eviction in terms of a compromise arrived af between the parties. Under the compromise the tenant agreed to vacate the accommodation by February 1, 1971. 3. On March 16, 1972 a, suit was filed by the tenant for a declaration that the order dated July 29, 1970 was a nullity and he was not obliged to leave the premises. He also applied for an interim injunction. The learned Subordinate Judge granted an injunction on May 20, 1972 restraining the landlord from enforcing the order of the Controller during the pendency of the suit. The landlord filed an appeal, and on November 28, 1972 the learned District Judge made an ord...


Dec 21 1976

Gurbax Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-21-1976

Reported in: 1977CriLJ1676

Chet Ram Thakur, J.1. The appellant was employed as a Patwari in district Kangra. Ha was charged for having accepted Rs. 100/- from Shri Hukmi Ram (P. W. 1) as gratification other than legal remuneration for demarcating his encroached land and providing him the possession of the said land and had thereby committed an offence Under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code. He was also charged Under Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 punishable Under Section 5(2) of the said Act for having obtained for himself Rs. 100/- from Shri Hukmi Ram by abusing his position as a public servant.2. It is stated that Shri Hukmi Ram made a complaint to Shri Amar Nath, Sub-Inspector of the Anti-Corruption Unit at Dharamsala on July 28, 1971 that he had gone to the appellant to get his land demarcated whereupon the appellant demanded Rupees 100/- from him for demarcating the land and to give him the vacant possession. The Sub-Inspector thereupon arranged a trap after having recorded th...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial