Himachal Pradesh Court October 1975 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dhyan Singh Vs. Director of Consolidation and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-28-1975
Reported in: AIR1976HP64
ORDERR.S. Pathak, C.J.1. The petitioner prays for relief under Article 226 of the Constitution against an order dated November 26, 1973 of the Director, Consolidation of Holdings dismissing his petition.2. The petitioner is a resident of village Saloh, Tehsil and District Una. Pursuant to a notification under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, consolidation operations were commenced in the area. After the pre-partition proceedings had been published the petitioner applied on January 12, 1971, for the reservation of land for the extension of his Abadi. The application was made under Section 42 of the Act to the Director, Consolidation of Holdings. It was recited that Khasra Nos. 10623/6564 and 11887/10626 11887/10626 were previously owned and possessed by the petitioner and his brother Hukam Singh, that the brother had applied to the Consolidation Officer for the allotment of the said khasra numbers for himself and the petitioner but the ...
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Charan Dass Dogra
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-22-1975
Reported in: 1976CriLJ1466
Chet Ram Thakur, J.1. In this revision petition the question which arises for decision is whether the Public Prosecutor can intervene at the stage of an enquiry under Section 202 of the Cr. P. Code, 1898, (hereinafter called the Code) in a case instituted on a complaint by a private person.2. Shri Charan Dass Dogra, an Advocate of Kulu had lodged a complaint under Sections 302, 307, 148, 149, 109, 114 and 120-B of the I. P. Code against S/Sliri Lal Chand Pararthi and five others. The judicial Magistrate in whose court the complaint was lodged took cognizance of the case as contemplated under Section 190 of the Code and he commenced an enquiry as contemplated under Section 202 of the Code. During the course of the enquiry, before processes were issued to the accused, Shri T. R. Sharma who is said to be a Magistrate and was connected with the arrangement of the DUSHERA fair when this occurrence is alleged to have taken place, was examined on 28-10-1971. Later on the Advocate-General appe...
Kanwarani Madna Vati and anr. Vs. Raghunath Singh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-07-1975
Reported in: AIR1976HP41
Thakur, J. 1. This R. F. A. 1 of 1965 and the cross-objections and R. F. A. 7 of 1966 arise out of a suit under the provisions of Order 34 of the Civil P. C. for the recovery of Rs. 16,000/- with costs and future interest by sale of mortgaged property described in para. 1 (g) of the plaint and further that in case the sale proceeds fall short of the amount due to the plaintiff for a personal decree to that extent or in the alternative for possession of the mortgaged property and a personal decree for interest and costs filed by the plaintiff against the defendant No. 1.2. The facts as emerge from the plaint are that the plaintiff is the son of Thakur Ram Bass proprietor of Marina Hotel, Simla, Defendant No. 1 is the widow of Kr. Mohan Singh of Junga, presently residing in Kasumpti Bazar of Simla District. She borrowed Rs. 13,400/-from the plaintiff against the security of the property mentioned in the mortgage deed, PA. This property consisted of several Khasra numbers and buildings th...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›