Himachal Pradesh Court May 1966 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Chamba Valley Transport Ltd.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-18-1966
Reported in: AIR1967HP32
1. This petition, under Article 133(1) of the Constitution of India, for the grant of a certificate that the case is a fit one For appeal to the Supreme Court is directed against an order of this Court, dated the 8th January 1968, whereby an application of the petitioner, under Section 151, C. P. C., for the reconstruction of the record of an appeal, was dismissed. The application was based on the following allegations:--2. The respondent had instituted a suit, against the petitioner, for the recovery of Rs. 1,40,000, as damages. The Senior Subordinate Judge, Chamba, who had disposed of the suit, had granted a decree for the recovery of Rs. 28,767-1-2, in favour of the respondent. The petitioner, through the Government Advocate, Chamba, had filed an appeal, in the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, against the decision of the Senior Subordinate Judge. The appeal was returned to the Government Advocate with certain office objections. The objections were complied with and the appeal was...
E.R. Samuel and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-06-1966
Reported in: AIR1966HP59
ORDEROm Prakash, J. 1. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the State of Punjab, the Punjab Electricity Board and the Resident Engineer, Shanan Power House, Joginder Nagar, respectively, respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 3 The petitioners challenge the validity of the levy of electricity duty, imposed upon them, under Section 3 of the Punjab Electricity (Duty) Act 1958, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The petition is based on the following allegations:The petitioners are the employees of respondent No. 2. They are, at present stationed at Joginder Nagar, in Himachal Pradesh and are working, in different capacities, in connection with the generation, control and supply of electrical energy, at and from the Shanan Power House, Joginder Nagar, under the control of respondent No. 2. The Legislature of the State of Punjab passed the Act for levying duty on the sale or consumption of electricity, supplied by respondent No. 2 to consumers or licensees...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›