Himachal Pradesh Court May 1965 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Harbhajan Singh Bawa Vs. Himachal Pradesh Government and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-31-1965
Reported in: AIR1965HP55
ORDEROm Parkash, J.C.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the Himachal Pradesh Government, respondent No. 1 and the secretary, Animal Husbandry, respondent No. 2. The facts, involved in the petition, are short and may be stated as follows :--2. The petitioner is a permanent Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, in the Animal Husbandry Department, Punjab. He was selected for the post of Officer In-charge Key Village Scheme, Himachal Pradesh (later on redesignated as Key Village Officer, Himachal Pradesh) by the Himachal Pradesh Territorial Council. The petitioner joined the post, under the Territorial Council, on the 31st March, 1961. The terms and conditions of the petitioner's appointment were contained in the letter of the Chief Executive Officer, Territorial Council, dated the 7th October, 1960.3. The Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, repealed the Territorial Councils Act, 1956, under which the Himachal Pradesh, Territorial Council ha...
Smt. Kali Vs. the State
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-20-1965
Reported in: AIR1966HP11,1966CriLJ20
ORDEROm Parkash, J. 1. This is a reference, made by the learned Sessions Judge, Mandi and Chamba, Sessions Division. 2. The petitioner was hauled up, under Section 302 I. P. C., for Ac murder of Smt. Parvati. The prosecution case, against the petitioner, was that she nursed a grudge, against Smt. Parvati, as the latter used to call her a woman of loose character and that the petitioner had taken revenge by murdering Smt. Parvati on the 9th May, 1964, in Domedhi Nal, when Smt. Parvati had gone to graze cattle, in the morning. As Smt. Parvati did not return home for her lunch, her husband, Brij Lal, along with others, had gone in search of her. The dead body of Smt. Parvati was spotted by one Smt. Ganeshu. The dead body was naked. There were blood stains on the vagina, thighs and abdomen. There were injuries on the head and face of the dead body. Three long bloodstained hair were found in the half closed fists fit the dead body 3. The report, about the murder, was lodged at the Police St...
Smt. Kamla Vs. the State
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-20-1965
Reported in: 1966CriLJ969
ORDEROm Parkash, J.C.1. This is a reference, made by the learned Sessions Judge, Mandi and Chamba, Sessions Division. Shri Dhani Ram, a Bailiff in the Civit Nazarat, Mandi, had submitted an application to the Senior Subordinate Judge, Mandi that he had been obstructed, by the petitioner, in the discharge of his public functions, while he was executing a warrant of attachment on the 17th December, 1963. The Senior Subordinate Judge forwarded the application to the Superintendent of Police Mandi, with the request, that enquiry be made in the matter and necessary action be taken. As the of tence, disclosed by the allegations, in the application, fell, under Section 186 I.P.C. which is a non-cognizable offence, the Superintendent of Police wrote to the? Magistrate, First Class, Mandi, that the S.H.O. Mandi may be granted permission for investigating the offence. After getting the necessary permission, the S.H.O. Mandi investigated the offence and put. in a report, in the Court of the Magis...
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Wazir Chand Mahajan
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-13-1965
Reported in: AIR1966HP40
Om Parkash, J. 1. This appeal, by the Union of India, is directed against a decree of the learned Senior Subordinate Judge Chamba, awarding a sum of Rs. 21,000, as compensation, to the respondent. 2. The respondent had filed a suit, against the appellant, for the recovery of Rs. 46,000, as compensation. The suit was based on the following allegations.Shri Trilok Nath, younger brother of the respondent, was granted a contract for extracting, collecting, and exporting medicinal herbs, such as Dhoop, Kaur, Mithi Patis, Tuth, Muskbala, Ban Kakru etc. from the forests of Chamba District for a period of one year, beginning with the first September, 1949, for a consideration of Rs. 38,900. The terms and conditions of the contract were embodied in an agreement dated the 16th June, 1949. Shri Trilok Nath got the contract for the above purpose for the next year also, beginning with first September, 1950, for a consideration of Rs. 70,000. The business of extracting, collecting and exporting the ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›