Himachal Pradesh Court April 1965 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dasaundhi Vs. the State
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-24-1965
Reported in: AIR1965HP68,1965CriLJ765
Om Prakash, J.C. 1. Dasaundhi, who has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahasu, Sirmur, Bilaspur and Kinnaur Sessions Division, under Section 302, I. P. C., for the murder of Shrimati Dhanni, and has been sentenced to death, has filed Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1965, against his conviction and sentence. . The learned Sessions Judge has also submitted the proceedings, to this Court, for the confirmation of the death sentence. The reference, made by the learned Sessions Judge, has been registered as Reference No. 1 of 1965. This judgment will dispose of both the appeal and the reference.2. The prosecution case against Dasaundhi appellant was as follows :3. Shrimati Dhanni, deceased, was the wife of the appellant. He suspected that Shrimati Dhanni was carrying on with his younger brother, Hari Ram, and intended to do away with him, by poisoning. The appellant was so much obsessed with the suspicion that Shrimati Dhanni had poisoned him that he had consulted Shankru PW-9, who wa...
Satya Pal Vs. State
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-1965
Reported in: AIR1965HP60,1965CriLJ763
ORDEROm Parkash, J.C.1. This order will dispose of Criminal References Nos. 16 and 17 of 1964, made by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahasu, Sirmur, Bilaspur and Kinnaur Sessions Division. The same point of law is involved in both the References.2. The : petitioner was charge-sheeted, under, Section 409, I. P.C., in two cases, by the Special Magistrate, Kasumpti, on the basis of two challans, filed by the Special Police Establishment, Ambala. It appears that neither the documents, referred to in Section 173, Cr P. C. nor their copies, were submitted, along with the challans, and that the copies were produced at the time of framing of charges and were taken back, by the prosecution, after the charges had been framed.3. The petitioner went up in revision to the learned Sessions Judge against the framing of charges. The main ground, taken up, in revision, was that the material, on which the charges were framed, by the Special Magistrate, did not justify the framing of charges and that the p...
Moti Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-1965
Reported in: AIR1966HP25
ORDEROm Parkash, J.1. This writ petition, under Aricle 226 of the Constitution of India, raises the question of the constitutional validity of Section 54 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, and of the due constitution of the Legislative Assembly, Himachal Pradesh, constituted, under the provisions of that section 2. Before the Constitution of the present Legislative Assembly, a Territorial Council, constituted, under the Territorial Councils Acl, 1956, was functioning in the Union terri tory of Himachal Pradesh Respondents Nos. 4 to 47 were the members of the last Territorial Council, constituted on the 3rd August, 1962. Respondent No 3 was not a member of that Territorial Council. He was elected to the present Legislative Assembly by direct election. 3. In 1953, Parliament enacted the Government of Union Territories Act, making pro vision for Legislative Assemblies and Councils of Ministers for certain Union territories This Act had come into force on the 1st July, 1963 ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›