Himachal Pradesh Court July 1964 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Shushila Devi Vs. Dhani Ram and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-10-1964
Reported in: AIR1965HP12
Om Parkash, J.1. This appeal is directed against an order of the learned Senior Subordinate Judge, Bilaspur, awarding maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings, to the appellant.2. The appellant had filed a petition, under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), for judicial separation, from respondent No. 1, her husband. She had, also, moved an application, under Section 24 of the Act, for the grant of maintenance pendente lite, and expenses of the proceedings. It was alleged, in the application, that the appellant was poor and had no independent income to support herself and for the necessary expenses of the proceedings and that respondent No. 1 was a rich man and his monthly income was Rs. 500/- The appellant had prayed that she be granted maintenance of Rs. 100/- per mensem, pendente lite, and a sum of Rs. 500/-, as expenses of the proceedings.3. The application was opposed, on behalf of respondent No. 1. It was denied that the appell...
The Collector Vs. Daulat Ram and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-02-1964
Reported in: AIR1965HP7
Om Parkash, J.1. This appeal, by the Collector, Bilaspur, is directed against an order of the learned Additional District judge Bilaspur, whereby, on three references, under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, the compensation, payable for acquisition of property, was enhanced, by Rs. 28,934.75 P.2. Land and buildings, situated in Bilaspur town, were acquired, in connection with the construction of Bhakra Reservoir. The major part of the property, acquired, was owned, exclusively, by Smt. Reshmu, since deceased, and her sons, Daulat Ram and Nauria Mal, respondents, and the rest was owned by them, jointly, with other persons. The Collector awarded compensation with respect to the acquisition of property. Smt. Reshmu and Daulat Ram and Nauria Mal, respondents, did not accept the award. Each of them filed a separate reference, putting forth objections, against the award qua her or his own share in the property, acquired. The three references were forwarded to the Court for determinati...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›