Skip to content

Himachal Pradesh Court March 1964 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 28 1964

The Land Acquisition Collector Vs. Smt. Parvati Devi

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-28-1964

Reported in: AIR1964HP32

Om Prakash, J.C.1. This appeal, by the Collector, Land Acquisition, Mahasu, is directed against an order of the District Judge, Mahasu, whereby, on a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), compensation payable to the respondent was enhanced by a sum of Rs. 2,385.95 nP.2. Land, measuring one bigha and one biswa, comprised in Khasra No. 224/1, situated in Masho-bra, Tehsil Kasumpti, District Mahasu, was acquired in connection with the construction of Dhali-Mashobra-Tatapani-Road. The land was owned by Shri Bihari Lal and was under the tenansy of Smt. Gulab Dassi, the mother of the respondent. The Collector, by his award, dated 3-9-59, awarded and apportioned, compensation, with respect to the acquisition of the land. Both Shri Bihari Lal and Smt. Gulab Dassi, felt dissatisfied with the award and filed objections against it. Their objections were referred to the learned District Judge, Mahasu, for determination.3. In the present appea...


Mar 11 1964

Roshan Lal Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-11-1964

Reported in: AIR1965HP1,1965CriLJ35

Om Parkash, J.C.1. Roshan Lal, Hari Nand and Yasin, residents of Misarwala, Tehsil Paonta, District Sirmur, were committed, to the Court of Sessions Judge, Mahasu, Sirmur, Bilaspur and Kinnaur Sessions Division, in connection, with the murder of Sant Ram, Forest Guard, who was incharge Majra, forest beat, Tehsil Paonta. The learned Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced Roshan Lal, under Sections 302 and 201 I. P. C., but acquitted Hari Nand and Yasin. Roshan Lal has filed Criminal Appeal No. 12/63 against his conviction and sentence. The Union of India has filed Criminal No. 24/63 against the acquittal ofHari Nand and Yasin. This judgment will dispose of both the appeals.2. The prosecution case against Roshan Lal, Hari Nand and Yasin, accused, was as follows:The relations, between Sant Ram and the villagers, including the residents of Misarwala village, had become strained as Sant Ram used to maintain a strict watch over the forest, in the discharge of his, official duties and did not...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial