Skip to content

Himachal Pradesh Court November 1962 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 29 1962

Sureshwari Datt Vs. Parma

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-29-1962

Reported in: AIR1963HP34

ORDERC.B. Capoor, J.C.1. This application in revision arises cut of an appellate order of the learned District Judge Mandi and Chamba districts confirming the order of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge Mandi returning the plaint filed by the petitioner for presentation to the proper Court. 2. !t is not' disputed that a lease dated 16th Sawan 2004 B. beginning from Rabi 2005 B. to Kharif 2009 B. was executed by the petitioner's father in favour of the respondent in respect of the disputed land situate in village Chattar Bahal. The said land was transferred in favour of the petitioner by his father. The respondent did not give up possession over the disputed land after the expiry of the period of lease. The petitioner filed a suit for recovery of possession of the disputed land and of Rs. 2,500/-as mesne profits for the last three years. 3. The suit was, in the main, resisted by the respondent on the ground that the relationship of landlord and tenant subsisted between the parties...


Nov 10 1962

Jai Singh Vs. Mansha Ram and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-10-1962

Reported in: AIR1963HP37

C.B. Capoor, J.C. 1. This first appeal by Shri Jai Singh is directed against a judgment and decree of the learned Senior Subordinate Judge, Mandi, whereby the claim put forward by respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and two others under the Fatal Accidents Act for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- was decreed for a sum of Rs. 7,680/- in favour of the respondents Nos. 1 and 2. 2. Near Dehar Tehsil Sundernagar district Mandi, there is a suspension bridge on river Sutlej. On one side of the bridge is Bilaspur District and on the other Mandi district. Dehar is in district Mandi. The bridge was suspended on two galvanised iron ropes on each side. It was to be widened and one more galvanised rope was to be added on each side. The contract for the widening of the bridge and for repair work had been given to the appellant. In August, 1955, the bridge was under repairs. Mehanga Ram, hereinafter to be referred as 'the deceased', the son of respondents Nos. I and 2, was passing over the bridge from Bilaspur side at abo...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial