Skip to content

Himachal Pradesh Court January 1961 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 13 1961

District Co-operative Federation Ltd. Vs. Khub Chand

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-13-1961

Reported in: AIR1961HP35

ORDERC.B. Capoor, J.C.1. This petition in revision by the District Co-operative Federation Ltd. Mandi is directed against an appellate judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, Mandi and Chamba districts, affirming an order of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge Mandi refusing to set aside an award made by Shri Kedar Ishwar, then Advocate at Mandi.2. An agreement Ex. P-1 was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent whereby the latter agreed to transport and supply firewood, charcoal etc. One of the terms of the agreement was that if any dispute will arise between the parties with regard to the supply and transport of firewood etc., it will be referred to the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Himachal Pradesh. vide Clause 11. A dispute did arise between the parties and an application was filed by the respondent for the filing of the agreement of reference in Court.The application was opposed but ultimately the dispute between the parties was referred to the ...


Jan 09 1961

Smt. Vijey Kumari Thakur Vs. H.P. Administration and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-09-1961

Reported in: AIR1961HP32

C.B. Capoor, J.C.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by Smt. Vijey Kumari Thakur against the Himachal Pradesh Administration, the Divisional Forest Officer and Shri Parmodh Chauhan.2. The allegations giving rise to the aforesaid petition are as below.3. Mrs. L.C. Thompson held Dakoni estate situate in revenue Chak Chhabra, Pargana Dharti Tehsil Kasumpti under a Qabuliat executed by her predecessor in interest in favour of the Government. On 26th of October, 1954, she sold the aforesaid estate to the petitioner who made an Application under Section 11 of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act hereafter to be referred as the Abolition Act for the acquisition of the proprietary rights in the aforesaid land.On 3rd of May, 1956, that application wasallowed and a sum of Rs. 342.78 nP adjudged tobe the compensation for the acquisition of proprietary rights, was paid by her to the credit ofthe State Government. The p...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial