Himachal Pradesh Court August 1959 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ramdayal Chunilal Yadav
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-1959
Reported in: AIR1960HP16
ORDERT. Ramabhadran, J.C.1. In this petition, purporting to be under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, I am requested to issue a writ of certiorari, or any otherappropriate writ or order, quashing the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge of Sirmur on 28-10-1957 in Civil Appeal No. 17-S/13 of 1956 and further to restrain the respondent (decree-holder) from taking any action under the aforesaid decree.2. The facts, leading to this petition, as stated thereunder, are, briefly, as follows: The respondent Shri R.C. Yadav was employed by the former State of Bilaspur, as an engineer. When Bilaspur State merged in the Union of India, Shri Yadav's services were continued in a temporary capacity. In March, 1950, the P. W. D. establishment of Bilaspur was brought under the control of the Himachal Pradesh P. W. D. The respondent was posted as S. D. O. Paonta, District Sirmur. It was, eventually, decided that the respondent should not be absorbed in permanent service and...
Ram Dayal Chunilal Yadav Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-1959
Reported in: AIR1960HP12
ORDERT. Ramabhadran, J.C.1. This petition, purporting to be tinder Article 226 of the Constitution, arises under the following circumstances : The petitioner was appointed in July, 1946, as an engineer in the erstwhile Bilaspur State on a salary of Rs. 350/- p. m. and was confirmed in that capacity on 15-3-1947, when his pay was increased to Rs. 400/- p.m. On 15-8-1948, Bilaspur State was merged in the Indian Dominion. The petitioner's designation was altered to 'Divisional Engineer' and he was permitted to draw the salary he was then receiving.From March, 1949, to April, 1950, petitioner worked as Divisional Engineer of Bilaspur State. On 25-5-1950, the petitioner received orders posting him as Sub-Divisional Officer, Paonta. The petitioner protested to the Chief Commissioner, Bilaspur, and also sent a representation to the States Ministry at Delhi, against being appointed to a lower post. On 21-8 1950, petitioner was informed that his services were to be terminated. He was also place...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›