Himachal Pradesh Court March 1957 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jindu and ors. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-1957
Reported in: AIR1957HP61
Ramabhadran, J.C. 1. These four second appeals were heard during the present circuit to Bilaspur. The appeals involve some common points for determination, relating to the powers of the erstwhile Raja of Bilaspur, prior to the accession of the Bilaspur State to the Union of India (which took place on 13-10-1948 A. D., corresponding to 28th Asoj 2005 B). After the accession of Bilaspur to the Indian Union, the territory was administered by the Central Government through a Chief Commissioner.The personal rule of the, Raja, however, ended with accession. In the present appeals, as I shall show presently, we are! concerned with certain escheats of property in favour of the Raja of Bilaspur and their subsequent grant by the Raja to various persons. (In Regular Second Appeal No. 1 of 1954, the escheat of land took place before accession, but it was sold subsequent to ascession, by the Chief Commissioner of Bilaspur).2. By means of two Robkars dated 1st. Sawan, 1982 and 1-8-1995 B., His Highn...
Babu Ram Vs. Gigu and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-1957
Reported in: AIR1957HP67
ORDER13. I allow the second appeal, set aside the decision of the District Judge dated 16-1-1954 in Appeal No. 50/13 of 1953 and restore that of the Subordinate Judge, Bilaspur, D/-8-8-1953 in suit No. 150 of 1952. In other words, the suit will stand dismissed. The appellant will get his costs here and in the Courts below, from the plaintiffs-respondents,...
Ram Chandar Vs. Jagan Nath and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-16-1957
Reported in: AIR1957HP70
ORDER16. I allow this second appeal(R.S.A. 13/54), set aside the decision of thelearned District Judge, Sirmur, dated 31-12-53,in Civil Appeal No. 8 S./13 of 1953 and dismissthe suit. Parties will bear their respective costshere and in the Courts below. The cross-objections, filed by Jagan Nath, in this Court failaccordingly and are dismissed....
The State Vs. Debnu and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-07-1957
Reported in: AIR1957HP52,1957CriLJ1254
Ramabhadran, J.C. 1. Debnu alias Devi Singh was tried by the learned Sessions Judge of Sirmur, sitting with Assessors, of an offence under Section 302, I. P. C. Agreeing with the unanimous opinion of the Assessors, the learned Judge came to the conclusion, that the offence was not brought home, to the accused; consequently, he acquitted him. The State Government has come up in appeal against this order of acquittal, under Section 417 Cr. P. C. This appeal is numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 6 of 1955. 2. The same Debnu alias Devi Singh was tried, along with 7 others, of offences punishable under Sections 194 and 201 I. P. C. read with Section 149 I. P. C. The learned Magistrate acquitted the accused persons, holding, that their guilt had not been proved. The State Government has come up in appeal against the acquittal of these accused persons. This appeal is numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1957. 3. Since, the two appeals arise out of the same transaction, and the evidence is to a l...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›