Guwahati Court August 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pradyut Kumar Chanda Vs. Girija Ram Lohar and Others
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-05-2015
Judgment and Order (Oral) 1. Heard Ms. T. Goswami, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. M. H. Rajbarbhuiyan, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This Second Appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 09.09.2004, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division No. 2, Cachar, Silchar, in Title Appeal No. 22/2003, dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and decree dated 30.07.2003, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division No. 1, Silchar, Cachar, in Title Suit No. 36/2001. 3. By an order dated 31.01.2006, the appeal was admitted to be heard on the following substantial question of law: Whether the findings of the learned Courts below on Issues No. 4, 5 and 6 were arrived at without considering the relevant evidence of DW1 Girija Ram Lohar (Defendant No. 1) and as such perverse and liable to be set aside. 4. The plaintiff filed the suit stating that on 11.12.2000, the defendants executed a Bainama (Agreement for sale) in favour of the p...
Kurpan Ali Vs. The Union of India, represented by the Ministry of Home ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-04-2015
Judgement and Order (Oral) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 29/08/2013 of the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal (III), Barpeta, Assam passed in FT Case No. 150(III)/2011 (Ref IM(D)T Case No. 7155/B/98) (State of Assam Vs. Kurpan Ali). By the said order, the learned Tribunal has declared the petitioner to be a foreign national, who illegally migrated into Assam after the cut-off date i.e. 25/03/1971. 2. I have heard Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned State Counsel and so also Ms. G. Sarma, learned counsel holding for Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned ASGI. I have also perused the entire materials on record including the records received from the Tribunal. As discussed in the impugned judgement, the petitioner, in the written statement, without naming his father, simply stated that his father s name appeared in the voter list of 1966. He also did not name his mother. He only stated that his father s name appeared not o...
Urban Board Engineers Association and Another Vs. The Assam Urban Wate ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-04-2015
Judgment and Order (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. S. Kataki, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. The respondent Assam Urban Water Supply and Sewerage Board (hereinafter referred to as the Urban Board ) and its Managing Director (MD) are represented by the learned counsel Mr. S.C. Keyal. The learned Sr. counsel Mr. D. Mazumdar, appears for the respondent No.4. The Govt. advocate Ms. B. Devi, appears for the respondent No.5. 2. The petitioner No.1 is an association of the engineers of the Urban Board and the 2nd petitioner is the General Secretary of the association. They challenge the order dated 19.12.2006 (Annexure-F), whereby the Public Relation Officer (PRO) Surjya Kanta Bora (respondent No.4) was appointed as the Secretary of the Urban Board. The legality of the appointment is questioned by alleging that the post of PRO is a much lower level post and the respondent No.4 was appointed to a post of higher pay and responsibility, on pick and choose basis. 3. The Urban Board was es...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›