Skip to content

Guwahati Court June 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 17 2015

Gita Rani Dhar and Others Vs. On the death of Milan Kanti Dey his lega ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jun-17-2015

1. Heard Mr. R.C. Sanchati, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. Sheeladitya, learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree of reversal dated 24-12-2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) No. 2, Kamrup, Guwahati in Title Appeal No. 21/1992 whereby the judgment and decree dated 24-04-1992 passed by the learned Sadar Munsiff, Guwahati in Title Suit No. 20/1982 was set aside and the suit filed by the plaintiff respondent was decreed on appeal, the defendant as appellant has preferred this second appeal before this Court. 3. The plaintiffs case, as setout in the plaint, is that he had purchased a plot of land measuring 3K-6L covered by Dag No. 686(Kha) of K.P. Patta No. 280 of village Kamakhya under Jalukbari mouza, more fully described in schedule- A to the plaint from the proforma defendant on 22-09-1975 by means of a registered deed of sale pursuant where to he has also been enjoying possession in respect th...


Jun 17 2015

Rina Bala Devi Vs. Md. Ahmed Ali

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jun-17-2015

1. Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Being aggrieved by the concurrent judgment and decree dated 12.12.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Goalpara in Money Appeal No.1/2014 the defendant as appellant has approached this Court by filing the instant Second Appeal. 3. The case of the respondent/plaintiff, in brief, is that the plaintiff had advanced a loan for an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) carrying interest at the rate of 10% per annum to the defendant with an agreement to repay the same within six months. There was an agreement entered by and between the parties to that effect but despite the same the appellant/defendant failed to repay the loan amount within the stipulated period as a result of which the plaintiff/respondent had to serve a pleaders notice upon the defendant demanding repayment of the loan amount. Since the said pleaders notice failed to evoke any response from the defendant, hence, the plaintiff was compelled to institute Money S...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial