Guwahati Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shujit Kumar Mondal and Others Vs. The State Of Assam and Others
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
Oral Judgment: 01. Both the writ petitions raise identical issues and, accordingly, were heard together. Today is fixed for delivery of judgment. Accordingly, judgment is dictated in the open court. 02. Issue raised in the two writ petitions is whether gradation list of Lecturers serving in the District Institutes of Education and Training (DIET) should be department/branch wise or cadre wise. 03. This issue has arisen in the context of the Assam District Institute of Education and Training Service Rules, 2010 (DIET Service Rules, hereafter). While the petitioners contend that the gradation list of Lecturers has to be department/branch wise, the respondents contend otherwise. This has given rise to the present lis. 04. Background facts may be briefly narrated. 05. Petitioners in both the cases are working as Lecturers in different branches in various DIETs in the State of Assam. To achieve the objective of universalization of elementary education and eradication of adult illiteracy, DI...
Ilen Gogoi and Others Vs. The State of Assam, Represented by the Princ ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
Cav Judgment: 1. As many as 9 (nine) writ petitioners involved in this case were appointed on ad-hoc basis in the year 2001 either as Enforcement Checker or as Assistant Enforcement Inspector under the Transport Department of Assam. Their appointment letters have been annexed at Annexure- 1 to this writ petition which shows that as per the term of their appointment they were required to appear before Selection Committee to qualify for being regularized in service and their failure to qualify in the selection test would result in automatic termination of their service. The Commissioner of Transport arranged for a selection process in the year 2002 and the written examination was conducted on 03.02.2002 in which the present petitioners had also participated. This selection process came under challenge before this court in PIL No. 19/2002 and a writ petition, numbered as WP(C) No. 6000/2002. Although, this Court dismissed the writ petition and the P.I.L on 29.01.2003, the aggrieved person...
Manish Kumar Vs. The Union of India, represented by the Secretary to t ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the Annexure-2 order dated 18/07/2012 discharging him from service on account of the resignation w.e.f. 01/10/2012. According to the petitioner he had never tendered resignation from service and the resignation letter that was shown to have been tendered by him is in fact is the product of forgery. 2. The petitioner joined the Assam Rifles as Sepoy (GD) in the year 2003 and thereafter was promoted as Rifleman in the year 2005. While he was posted at the newly formed Unit of the Assam Rifles i.e. 46 Assam Rifles, he was punished for unauthorized absence from duty. Thereafter he joined duty but on 18/07/2012, the impugned order was issued discharging him from service w.e.f. 01/10/2012. Such discharge was on the ground of resignation from service tendered by him. 3. As regards the unauthorized absence from duty, it is the stand of the petitioner that he had to leave the Unit to attend his mother who was in a very critical condition. That was in 2010. As s...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›