Guwahati Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhaben Gogoi Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-02-2014
A.M. Sapre, CJ. Heard Mr. S. Borgohain, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, IOC. This is an intra-court appeal filed by the writ petitioner of WP(C) 5828/2013 under Rule 2(3) of Chapter V-A of the Gauhati High Court Rules against the order dated 03.10.2013 passed by the Single Judge in abovementioned writ petition. By impugned order, the Single Judge dismissed the appellants writ petition and declined to grant the relief claimed in the writ petition. So the short question, which arises for consideration in this writ appeal, is whether learned Single judge was justified in dismissing the appellants writ petition. The dispute in the writ petition out of which this appeal arises relates to the allotment of retail outlet of sale of petrol/diesel by the IOC in State of Assam. It was not in dispute that the appellant had earlier filed similar writ petition being W.P(C) No 775 of2012 for grant of...
Riajul Haque and Another Vs. State of Assam and Others
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jan-02-2014
A.M. Sapre, CJ. Heard Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. BJ Talukdar, learned Government Advocate, Assam. This is an intra-court appeal filed by the writ petitioners of WP(C) No.5550/2012 under Rule 2(3) of Chapter V-A of the Gauhati High Court Rules against the order dated 18.9.2013 passed by the Single Judge in abovementioned writ petition. By impugned order, the Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants and declined to grant them the relief claimed therein. So the question, which arises for consideration in this appeal, is whether learned Single Judge was justified in dismissing the appellants writ petition. Facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. They, however, need mention in brief infra. The appellants had filed the writ petition challenging the very appointment process of grade IV employees in Assam Secretariat, in which, they too had participated, as candidates along with several others, but to their misfortune were not selected. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›