Skip to content

Guwahati Court September 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 06 2013

Puspendra Hazarika and Others Vs. Gajen Hazarika

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Sep-06-2013

Judgment and Order, (Cav): [1] Heard Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel, appearing for the appellants/ defendants. None represented the respondent/ plaintiff. [2] This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 04.06.2002, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nagaon, in Title Appeal No. 04/2001, whereby the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nagaon set aside the judgment and decree, dated 19.12.2000, passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 1, Nagaon in Title Suit No. 137/1997. [3] The respondent, as plaintiff, claiming to be owner of a plot of land, measuring 1 (one) Bigha 2 (two) Khatas, as mentioned in the schedule A to the plaint, instituted T.S. No. 137/1997 before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nagaon, seeking declaration of right, title and interest, in respect of the A schedule land, khas possession in respect of B Schedule land and confirmation of possession in respect of Schedule C land. Schedule A land includes the land described ...


Sep 05 2013

Manoranjan Kalita Vs. the State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Sep-05-2013

Judgment and Order, (Oral): 1. By the judgment and order, dated 24.08.2010, passed, in Special Case No. 06/2007, by the learned Special Judge, Guwahati, Assam, the accused-appellant, namely, Manoranjan Kalita, stands convicted under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short, PC Act, 1988) and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 (two) years and pay fine of Rs. 25,000/- and, in default of payment of fine, suffer rigorous imprisonment for a further period of 3 (three) months. 2. The case of the prosecution may, in brief, be described as under: (i) On the basis of an enquiry, conducted by the Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Assam, Guwahati, a First Information Report (in short FIR) was lodged, alleging, inter-alia, thus: Accused Manoranjan Kalita (i.e., the appellant herein) was appointed, on 01.04.1970, as Range Officer in the Department of Soil Conservation, Government of Assam, at the pay scale of Rs. 375/- and, later on, he ...


Sep 04 2013

Varsha Sathees and Others Vs. State of Assam, Represented by the Commi ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Sep-04-2013

Judgment and Order, (Oral): 1. Heard Mr. S.K. Medhi, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner in the WP(C) 4399/2013. Ms. J.M. Konwar, the learned Counsel is appearing for the 2 petitioners in the WP(C) 4235/2013 and WP(C) 4238/2013 and advocate Mr. S. Chamaria is representing the petitioner in the WP(C) 4216/2013. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam who appears for the respondents. 2. The 4 petitioners applied for admission into MBBS Course 2013 for the Medical Colleges located in Assam and they challenge the rejection of their candidature on the ground of non fulfilling the eligibility condition laid down by Rule 3(2) of the Medical Colleges of Assam, Regional Dental College, Guwahati and Government Ayurvedic College, Guwahati (Regulation of Admission of Undergraduate Students) Rules, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the Admission Rules) which requires an applicant to be Permanent Residents of Assam. They also challenge the order(s) dated 26.7...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial