Skip to content

Guwahati Court March 2013 Judgments

Mar 13 2013

Bacchu Miah Vs. State of Tripura

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-13-2013

1. Heard Mr. A.K. Bhowmik, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. A. Ghosh, learned State counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner who was serving as the Assistant Investigator under the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Govt. of Tripura did not attend his duty for a long period from 11-05-1993 till filing of the memorandum of charges on 19-09-1994. Having no knowledge of the said proceeding the petitioner filed a petition before this Court challenging the action of the respondents for not allowing him to resume the duties. The said writ petition being W.P.(C) No.203 of 2002 was ultimately withdrawn by the petitioner when he came to know that the disciplinary proceeding had been drawn up against him. By the order dated 19-11-2007 this Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty. 3. It appears from the records so produced by Mr. A. Ghosh, learned State Counsel and also from the counter affidavit filed by the ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2013

All Manipur Judicial Officers’ Association’ Vs. State of Man ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-12-2013

1. Heard Mr. Serto T. Kom, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Th. Ibohal, learned Advocate General, Manipur assisted by Ms. Sobhna, learned GA appearing for the respondents. 2. The fact of this case itself shows clearly that the State Government vide Office Memorandum being No.1/2/2009-MIS(MGEL) Imphal 25.09.2009 had meted out discriminatory treatment to the members of the Manipur Judicial Service amongst equals, by denying the benefits enjoyed by members of other organized services under the said Memorandum dated 25.09.2009; rather, members of the Manipur Judicial Service are subjected to humiliation by repeatedly subjecting them to the MGEL (CPIS) formalities for the purpose of drawing salaries after appointment, transfer and posting, promotion etc. 3. This court, in the peculiar circumstances of this case, is opening this judgment with the above unhappy words. 4. The members of the Manipur Judicial Service stoop low in seeking reliefs in the present writ petition for a directio...

Tag this Judgment!

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial