Guwahati Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thiyam Imocha Vs. the District Magistrate and Others
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-31-2012
T. NK Singh, J. 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to (i) the detention order being No. Cril/NSA/No.100 of 2011, Imphal the 24th August, 2011 issued by the District Magistrate Imphal West Manipur in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section-3 of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 (NSA for short) read with Home Departments order No.17(1)/49/80-H (Pt-I) dated 09.8.2011 directing the petitioner-detenu, Shri Thiyam Imocha Singh, who is now in police custody, be detained under Section 3(2) of the NSA, 1980 until further orders; (ii) the order of the Governor of Manipur being No.17(1)158/2011 H: Imphal the 1st Sept., 2011 for approving the detention order dated 24.8.2011 and also (iii) the order of the Governor being No.17(1)158/2011-H: Imphal the 7th Oct., 2011 for confirming the detention order dated 24.8.2011 and fixed the period of detention for 12 (twelve) months from the date of detention only on the ground that rights of the petitioner-detenu guaranteed under A...
Deepak Paul and Another Vs. the State of Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-29-2012
This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 02-12-2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Karimganj in Criminal Appeal No.2(1)/2003. By the said judgment, the learned Sessions Judge affirmed the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioners by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karimganj vide the judgment and order dated 13-12-2002 passed in CR Case No.634/2001. [2] This is a case under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (briefly the PFA Act). [3] The facts of the case may be briefly noted. [4] On 27-12-2000 at about 2:30 PM, the Food Inspector visited the grocery shop called M/S Santush Bhowmik to check the quality of food grains kept in the shop for sale. The Food Inspector took sample of Besan (gram power) by purchasing 600 gms after observing the formalities. He divided the sample into three equal parts and made three packets. One sample packet was sent to the Public Analyst at Guwahati and other two samples were deposited with the Local He...
Hriday Lal Kaipeng Vs. State of Tripura
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-11-2012
Saha, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the sole appellant, Hriday Lal Kaipeng, against the judgment and order, dated 6-8-2007, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, South Tripura, Udaipur in ST 48 (ST/A) 2006 whereby and whereunder, the appellant was convicted under Section 302, IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to suffer further one year R.I. 2. Heard Mr. P.K. Ghosh, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. D. Sarkar, learned P.P. appearing for the State respondent. 3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows: On 18/19-3-2006, at about 1.00 a.m. the victim Nerdhan Lein Kaipeng came to his elder brothers house with bleeding injuries. Having seen him, the informant, Rampak Kaipeng (PW.1), the elder brother of the victim, enquired how he had sustained the bleeding injuries. Then, the victim stated that the accused appellant Hriday Lal Kaipeng and one Lalshu Mukta Kaipeng had injured him in the house of one Su...
The Managing Committee of New Hindi Secondary School Vs. Banamali Sinh ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-03-2012
1. Heard Mr. A.K. Bhowmik, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Kundu, learned Advocate General appearing for the respondents. 2. At the outset, learned Advocate General raised the question of maintainability of this proceeding on the solitary point that the order dated 30-9-2011 as passed in this proceeding since merged with the order dated 23-2-2012 as passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Cont. App. (C) No.02/2011, this proceeding cannot be carried on any further. In other words, for the order dated 23-2-2012 the proceeding has to be closed. For appreciation, the relevant part of the order dated 30-9-2011 is required to be excerpted. 32. In this proceeding, the petitioner has categorically stated that, after the order passed in W.P.(C) No.360/2008 and W.P.(C) No.235/2009, the petitioner approached the respondents for granting an amount of Rs.95,90,769/- towards payment of arrear salaries and for implementing the Mid-Day-Meal Scheme. It has a...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›