Guwahati Court February 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md. Sahed Ali Vs. Mahela Begum
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-29-2012
1. Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. A. R. Sikdar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. The respondent as the first party had filed a petition against the petitioner in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M. (S), Barpeta, under Section 125 Cr.P.C, seeking maintenance for her minor daughter, whom she claimed to be the illegitimate child of the petitioner. 3. The said petition was registered as Case No. 254/07. The petitioner, who was arrayed as the second party, contested the said case by filing his written statement, where he denied that the respondent was his wife and also denied that her child was his illegitimate child. 4. The first party examined 3 (three) witnesses to prove her case. On the other hand, the second party adduced the evidence of 2 (two) witnesses. 5. On consideration of the materials on record, the learned Magistrate framed the following two issues for determination: 1. Whether the daughter of the first party is the illegi...
Banamali Sinha, Ias and Another Vs. the Managing Committee of New Hind ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-23-2012
Reported in: 2012CrLJ1843
Katakey, J. 1. This appeal, by the contemnors, is directed against the order dated 30.09.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge recording prima facie satisfaction of commission of contempt of Court in violating the order dated 26.08.2010 passed in WP(C) No.378/2010 and drawing up the contempt proceeding against them, which was registered and numbered as Cont.Cas(C) No.20/2010, and asking them to show-cause as to why action under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (in short the 1971 Act) shall not be taken and appropriate punishment for contempt of court shall not be awarded. 2. The facts relevant for the purpose of the present appeal may be noticed as under: (i) The Govt. of Tripura, Education (School) Department, vide notification dated 16.04.2007, initially brought the New Hindi Secondary (Hindi and English medium) School, Khejurbagan, Agartala, under the State Grant-in-Aid scheme of the Education (School) Department w.e.f. 01.04.2007, thereby bringing all the existing 2...
Banamali Sinha, Ias and Another Vs. the Managing Committee of New Hind ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-23-2012
Katakey, J. 1. This appeal, by the contemnors, is directed against the order dated 30.09.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge recording prima facie satisfaction of commission of contempt of Court in violating the order dated 26.08.2010 passed in WP(C) No.378/2010 and drawing up the contempt proceeding against them, which was registered and numbered as Cont.Cas(C) No.20/2010, and asking them to show-cause as to why action under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (in short the 1971 Act) shall not be taken and appropriate punishment for contempt of court shall not be awarded. 2. The facts relevant for the purpose of the present appeal may be noticed as under: (i) The Govt. of Tripura, Education (School) Department, vide notification dated 16.04.2007, initially brought the New Hindi Secondary (Hindi and English medium) School, Khejurbagan, Agartala, under the State Grant-in-Aid scheme of the Education (School) Department w.e.f. 01.04.2007, thereby bringing all the existing 2...
Maran Ghosh Vs. State of Tripura and Others
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-13-2012
S.C. DAS. J. 1. This writ appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 18-11-2011, passed by a learned Judge of this Court, in W.P. (C) No.320/2011, under Art. 226 of Constitution of India. 2. We have heard learned counsel, Mr. P. Roy Barman, for the appellants, and gone through the impugned judgment and other materials on record. 3. Haridhan Ghosh, further of the appellant, was admitted in GB Hospital, on 3-1-2000, at about 11.30 a.m., while he was suffering from Bronco-Asthma and internal respiratory trouble. Doctors attended him and put him on oxygen. The allegations, made in the writ petition, were that the oxygen cylinder was not functioning properly and that some medicines were prescribed, but those were not administered to the patient by the attending nurses, the patient became restless with respiratory trouble and developed other symptoms and despite request of the writ petitioners, the patient was not attended to properly and due to sheer negligence of the doctors ...
Haren Das and Others Vs. the State of Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-03-2012
Reported in: 2012CrLJ1467
A.C. Upadhyay, J. 1. Extant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 2.4.2009, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Lakhimpur, Assam, in Sessions Case No.104 (NL)/2007, whereby each of the appellants above named were convicted under Sections 143/147/148 IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for three (3) months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-. 2. Additionally, the appellant No.1, Haren Das was convicted under Section 325/149 IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one (1) year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulation. Appellant Nos.2 and 3 namely, Sri Puspa Das and Sri Kanti Das, have also been convicted under Section 324/148 IPC and each of them were sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six (6) months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulation and the appellant Nos.4 and 5, namely, Sri Bapkon Das and Sri Makhana Das have been convicted under Section 323/149 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for two (2) months ...
M/S. Brahmaputra Iron and Steel Company Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Prem ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-03-2012
1. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been filed by the opposite party, praying for quashing of Case No. 15m of 2010, under Sections 145/146 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’, in short), now pending before the learned Executive Magistrate, Amingaon, Kamrup (Rural), Guwahati. 2. Heard Sri A K Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri S Ali, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. Also heard Sri B B Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. I have also perused the documents annexed with the Criminal Petition. 3. The criminal case has been filed by the respondent No. 1, alleging that the petitioners attempted to occupy/encroach the suit land on 10.03.2010, which led to law and order situation. On the basis of the said application, the proceeding under Section 145 CrPC was drawn up vide order dated 12.03.2010. By the same order, the learned Executive Magistrate also attached ...
Haren Das and Others Vs. the State of Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-03-2012
A.C. Upadhyay, J. 1. Extant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 2.4.2009, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Lakhimpur, Assam, in Sessions Case No.104 (NL)/2007, whereby each of the appellants above named were convicted under Sections 143/147/148 IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for three (3) months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-. 2. Additionally, the appellant No.1, Haren Das was convicted under Section 325/149 IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one (1) year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulation. Appellant Nos.2 and 3 namely, Sri Puspa Das and Sri Kanti Das, have also been convicted under Section 324/148 IPC and each of them were sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six (6) months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulation and the appellant Nos.4 and 5, namely, Sri Bapkon Das and Sri Makhana Das have been convicted under Section 323/149 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for two (2) months ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›