Guwahati Court December 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sidheswar Koch and Others Vs. the State of Assam, Represented by the C ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
ORAL: 1. Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S. Samaria, learned Standing Counsel, Agriculture Department. 2. By means of this writ petition, the four petitioners claiming themselves to be M.R. workers working in the Agriculture Department on being appointed prior to 1.4.1993, have claimed regularization of their services and release of their admissible salary. So far as the prayer for regularization of services is concerned, no direction can be issued in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court reported in 2006(2) GLT 654(FB) (Jitendra Kalita Vs. State of Assam and Ors). 3. As regards the prayer for release of salary, according to the petitioner, they are entitled to receive the same for the year 2007-08. On the other hand, the respondents have denied the very existence of the petitioners in their employment roll. In the counter affidavit filed on 3.9.2011, the respondents have stated that the petitioners were not engaged as MR workers in the O...
Ali Mohammad Zahid Alshid Vs. Musstt. Babita Khatun
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-17-2011
1. By this revision petition the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the judgment and order dated 7-3-2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Goalpara in Case No. C. M. 47 of 2010. 2. The facts leading to the filing of this petition may be briefly stated. 3. The Opp. Party filed a petition under Section 3(1) of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Goalpara against eh present petitioner, who was arrayed as the opp. party therein. The said petition was registered as Case No. MCR-355/2009. According to the opp. Party, both the petitioner and the opp. Party got married on 6-1-2003 as per Muslim law. The dower was fixed at Rs. 25,001/- out of which an amount of Rs.200/- was paid by the petitioner. Thus, an amount of Rs.24,801/- remained outstanding as deferred dower. Out of wedlock, one child was born in the year 2005. According to the opp. Party, the petitioner began to make demands f...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›