Skip to content

Guwahati Court August 2010 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Aug 05 2010

Sri Naba Kumar BorgohaIn Vs. the State of Assam.

Court: guwahati

Decided on: Aug-05-2010

1. Heard Mr. P. J. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R. P. Sharma, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. M. R. Adhikary, learned counsel for respondent No. 6 and Mr. A. K. Goswami, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Banik, learned Standing Counsel representing for the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council (KAAC). 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities for allotment of his official duties, office room, other facilities etc. available to him as a senior UDA in the office of Howraghat Higher Secondary School, and for release of the loan amount sought for by him for treatment of his ailing widowed mother, with compensations etc. 3. The petitioner has alleged that he has been ill treated by the respondent No. 6, the Principal of the Howraghat Higher Secondary School on various ways. The petitioner has further stated that he was suspended from service on 18. 7. 2005 while he was serving as an UDA (Upper Divisin Assis...


Aug 05 2010

The Assam State Electricity Board Pensioners' Association Vs. the Assa ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Aug-05-2010

1. Heard Mr. P. C. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing counsel, respondent-ASEB. 2. By this writ petition the petitioner representing all retired employees of the Assam State Electricity Board (in short 'ASEB), prayed for issuing a direction to the respondent ASEB to provide medical reimbursement facilities to the retired employees at par with the serving employees of the ASEB or similar to that of the retired employees of the State Government of Assam in terms of the provisions made under the Assam Medical Attendance Rules, 1976. 3. It has been stated on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners' Association on number of occasions approached the respondent authorities to fulfill their legitimate demand of providing medical re-imbursement facilities after retirement , at par with the serving employees of the ASEB or in the manner prescribed for retired State Government employees. It has been further stated that in spite of repetitive app...


Aug 03 2010

Smt. Nizara Saikia Vs. the Inspector General of Police.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Aug-03-2010

1. Heard Mr. B. D. Konwar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. P. S. Deka, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate, Assam. 2. Late Jibeswar Saikia, Constable No. 689 in the 11th AP Bn. was dismissed from service for unauthorised absence from his duties w. e. f. 19. 08. 1997 to 15. 11. 2000. 3. This writ petition has been filed by the wife of late Jibeswar Saikia for issuance of a direction to the respondent authorities to pay the arrear subsistence allowance and other financial benefits like ex-gratia, GPF,GIS, etc. to the legal heirs of her deceased husband and also for setting aside the order of the dismissal of the petitioner s husband and for payment of the subsistence allowance and other consequential financial benefits on behalf of her husband. 4The facts leading to filing of the writ petition in short are as follows:- The husband of the petitioner late Jibeswar Saikia was a constable in the 11th Assam Police Battalion ,Dergoan, District,Golaghat. He was dismissed fr...


Aug 03 2010

Sri Mahesh Deka Vs. the State of Assam.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Aug-03-2010

1. Heard Mr. T. Islam, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. B. S. Sinha, learned Addl. PP representing the State. ,2. The petitioner who was serving as an Armed Branch Constable in the Assam Police challenges the order dated 13. 12. 99 (Annexure -D), whereby he has been dismissed from service in pursuant to a disciplinary proceeding. The petitioner also challenges the order dated 17. 11. 01 (Annexure-F) passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby the inflicted penalty has been approved, by dismissing his Appeal. 3. Following an incident on 16. 9. 98 evening during an anti- insurgency operation launched by the Police, which led to fatal injuries on the O. C. of Duliajan P. S. S. I. Khagen Konwar and S. I. Pranab Buragohain ,who were shot by Motor cycle riding extremists, a preliminary enquiry was conducted. In the report dated 19. 9. 98, the Supdt. of Police, Dibrugarh recorded the following preliminary finding :-" (1) Inspite of concrete information of movement of extremist...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial