Guwahati Court October 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Transport Workers Association. Vs. the State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Oct-11-2010
1. The petitioner, which is an association of the workers of Assam State Transport Corporation (ASTC) and registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, represented by its General Secretary, by the present petitioner has challenged the Notice Inviting Tenders (in short the NIT) dated 22.02.2010 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority (in short the GMDA), inviting bids from the reputed companies/firms in respect of 150 buses, for city bus operations purchased with the additional central assistance provided by the Govt. of India under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (in short JnNURM), contending inter alia that pursuant to the announcement of the package by the Govt. of India on 02.01.2009 for providing assistance as a onetime measure under JnNURM for purchase of buses for the Urban Transport System and consequent upon approval of the project report by the Govt. of Assam on 18.02.2009 for availing assistance under the said schem...
State Transport Workers Vs. the Managing Director.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Oct-11-2010
1. The petitioner, which is an association of the workers of Assam State Transport Corporation (ASTC) and registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, represented by its General Secretary, by the present petitioner has challenged the Notice Inviting Tenders (in short the NIT) dated 22. 02. 2010 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority (in short the GMDA), inviting bids from the reputed companies/firms in respect of 150 buses, for city bus operations purchased with the additional central assistance provided by the Govt. of India under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (in short JnNURM), contending inter alia that pursuant to the announcement of the package by the Govt. of India on 02. 01. 2009 for providing assistance as a one time measure under JnNURM for purchase of buses for the Urban Transport System and consequent upon approval of the project report by the Govt. of Assam on 18. 02. 2009 for availing assistance under the sai...
Mani Kumar Subba S/O Lt. Dhan Bahadur SubbA. Vs. the State of Assam.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Oct-07-2010
1. Heard Mr. B. C. Das, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. P. Upadhyay, learned counsel., appearing on behalf of accused petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P.P., appearing on behalf of respondent State of Assam and Mr. A. M. Borah, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of informant victim woman.2. Apprehending arrest in connection with Chandmari P. S. Case No. 253/2010 registered under Section 376 I.P.C. based on a written FIR dated 13.07.2010 lodged by one Smti. Shikha Sharma, the present accused petitioner has moved this bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for releasing him on pre-arrest bail.3.This is the second bail application filed by the present accused petitioner Sri Mani Kumar Subba on what is called fresh grounds after the first bail application was rejected by this court vide order dated 28.07.2010 in B.A. No. 3265/2010 in connection with the aforesaid police case.4. In the aforesaid FIR, it has been alleged that th...
Mani Kumar Subba Vs. the State of Assam.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Oct-07-2010
1. Heard Mr. B. C. Das, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. P. Upadhyay, learned counsel. , appearing on behalf of accused petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P. P. , appearing on behalf of respondent State of Assam and Mr. A. M. Borah, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of informant victim woman. 2. Apprehending arrest in connection with Chandmari P. S. Case No. 253/2010 registered under Section 376 I. P. C. based on a written FIR dated 13. 07. 2010 lodged by one Smti. Shikha Sharma, the present accused petitioner has moved this bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for releasing him on pre-arrest bail. 3. This is the second bail application filed by the present accused petitioner Sri Mani Kumar Subba on what is called fresh grounds after the first bail application was rejected by this court vide order dated 28. 07. 2010 in B. A. No. 3265/2010 in connection with the aforesaid police case. 4. In the aforesaid FIR, it has been a...
Shri Lokho Mao, S/O Late Adani Mao, Vs. the State of Manipur Represent ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. Heard Mr. L. Sarat Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Th Ibohal Singh, learned Senior G.A., Manipur.2. The hearing of the case was concluded on 16.9.2010 with a direction to the learned Sr. G.A., Manipur, to submit the relevant file to the Court through the Bench Clerk within three days. No file, as directed by the Court has been submitted despite lapse of two weeks.3. Facts which are relevant for disposal of this writ petition as ascertained from the records and pleadings of the parties, may be noticed as hereunder.3(i) the petitioner who belongs to Mao Naga tribe of Manipur was appointed as Rifleman No. 8510 in the 8th Bn, Manipur Rifles, vide order dated 18.11.87. It is stated that the petitioner was absent from duty for four days with effect from 31.12.1989 to 3.1.1990 and thereafter he reported for duty on 6.1.1990. The petitioner was again absent from duty for a period of seventeen days with effect from 6.1.1990 to 22.1.1990. The explanation given by the petiti...
Shri Lokho Mao Vs. the State of Manipur.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Oct-01-2010
1. Heard Mr. L. Sarat Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Th Ibohal Singh, learned Senior G. A., Manipur. 2. The hearing of the case was concluded on 16. 9. 2010 with a direction to the learned Sr. G. A., Manipur, to submit the relevant file to the Court through the Bench Clerk within three days. No file, as directed by the Court has been submitted despite lapse of two weeks. 3. Facts which are relevant for disposal of this writ petition as ascertained from the records and pleadings of the parties may be noticed as hereunder. 3(i) The petitioner who belongs to Mao Naga tribe of Manipur was appointed as Rifleman No. 8510 in the 8th Bn, Manipur Rifles, vide order dated 18. 11. 87. It is stated that the petitioner was absent from duty for four days with effect from 31. 12. 1989 to 3. 1. 1990 and thereafter he reported for duty on 6. 1. 1990. The petitioner was again absent from duty for a period of seventeen days with effect from 6. 1. 1990 to 22. 1. 1990. The explanation g...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›