Guwahati Court August 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Debashis Chakraborty Vs. Smt. Mausumi Bhattacharjee
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-01-2007
1. The appellant is the husband of the respondent. She filed a petition for annulment of her marriage with the appellant on the only ground that the marriage between them could not be consummated owing to impotence of the appellant, aground provided in Section 12(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter called as the Act) rendering a marriage voidable.2. Her petition was allowed by the Family Court, Agartala, West Tripura by judgment dated 21-3-2006 in Title Suit (nullity) 55 of 2003 annulling the marriage by a decree of nullity. Aggrieved, the husband is before us in appeal.3. In her petition under Section 12(1)(a) of the Act, she averred that her marriage with the appellant, a veterinary surgeon serving under the State Govt. was solemnized on 7-2-2003 by performing all essential Hindu Vedic rites in the house of her parents. On the following day, she came to the house of her husband, the appellant herein. Though they shared the same bed, there was no approach from him for ...
Kali Mohan Sahaji and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-01-2007
Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. With the consent of the learned Counsels representing the parties in these four proceedings, the matters are being taken up for analogous hearing since the substantial issue involved in each of the cases is similar. The necessary facts in each of the cases are being set out later in the judgment being pronounced.2. Heard Mr. M. Kar Bhowmik, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in all the four writ petitions. Also heard Mr. R.B. Sinha, learned Counsel appearing for the State respondents in Civil Rule Nos. 574 of 1997,577 of 1997 and 582 of 1997. Mr. J. Majumder, learned Govt. Advocate appears for the State respondents in W.P.(C) No. 352 of 2006.Mr. A. K. Deb, learned Counsel appears for private respondent No. 4 in Civil Rule No. 574 of 1997. Similarly, Mr. Section Lodh, learned Counsel appears for the private respondent No. 4 in W.P.(C) No. 352 of 2006.3. For the sake of convenience, the essential facts in the writ petitions are taken note of separa...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›