Skip to content

Guwahati Court February 2005 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 01 2005

Suruj Ali Vs. State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Feb-01-2005

P.G. Agarwal, J. 1. Heard Mr. B. Choudhury, the learned Amicus Cu riae for the accused appellant and Mr. F.H. Laskar, the learned P.P.2. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 8.4.97 passed by the Sessions Judge, Cachar, Silchar in Sessions Case No. 92 of 1996 (GR Case No. 1008/ 96) convicting the accused appellant Under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default further imprisonment for one month.3. This is an unfortunate case of death of a house wife in the hands of her husband accused appellant Suruj Ali. The accused was married to one Joytunnessa and out of the said wedlock two children were born to them. According to the prosecution on 5.5.1996 at about 7 p.m. the accused appellant assaulted his wife whereupon the victim raised alarm and the neighbours came who saw the accused assaulting the deceased by kick and blow and as alleged the deceased was assaulted by lathi and thereafter the accused fled the ...


Feb 01 2005

Samina R. Marak Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Feb-01-2005

Amitava Roy, J.1. The validity of the order of detention dated 15.4.2004 passed by the District Magistrate, South Garo Hills District, Baghmara in exercise of powers under Section 3(1) of the Meghalaya Preventive Detention Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to the 'Act') and the continued detention of the detenue Sri Tokyo R. Marak is in question.2. We have heard Mr. AK Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. U Bhuyan, learned State counsel and Mr. H Rahman, teamed senior Central Government Standing counsel for the Union of India.3. The indispensable facts can be located in a short compass. The detenu named hereinabove, a Lower Primary school teacher in a Government L.P. School in the State of Meghalaya who was already lodged in custody being arrested on 3.4.2004 in connection with some criminal cases, was slapped with the above order of preventive detention. The grounds of detention were served on him on 15.4.2004 whereafter on 27.4.2004 the State Government approved the detention ...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial