Guwahati Court December 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Kamal Roy
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-02-2004
1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 10.1.2001 passed in Original Application No. 181/98 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench. 2. The aforesaid Original Application was filed by the respondent Shri Kamal Roy challenging the order dated 18.6.1996 issued by the Director General (Security) imposing upon him the penalty of compulsory retirement from service. It may be mentioned here that the penalty of compulsory retirement was imposed on conclusion of the departmental proceedings initiated against the respondent in connection with two charges. For better appreciation the articles of charges are quoted below :-. 'Article - IThat the said Shri Kamal Roy, while functioning as Assistant in the office of the DIG, TC Haflong w.e.f. 12.12.1986, left the office in the afternoon on 9.9.1988 after submitting his leave application but without handing over proper charge of his office seat including restricted documents and Steel Almirah with keys, held by him u...
Director General Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and ors ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-02-2004
A. Hazarika, J.1. By this common judgment, the WP(C) No. 2018/2001 and 2019/2001 are being disposed of as they pose a common question of law.2. In both the writ petitions, the petitioners have assailed the orders dated 20th November, 2000 and 5th January, 2001 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench in O.A. No. 308/99 and 303/99 respectively whereby the respondents were directed to consider the case of the applicants to regularise their services as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of passing of the judgments.3. We have heard Mr. P. Bhowmick, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S. Sharma, the learned counsel for the respondents.4. The respondent in WP(C) No. 2018/2001 was appointed as Project Assistant on a consolidated pay of Rs. 500 per month by the order dated 25th November, 1983 in the Regional Research Laboratory, Jorhat, Assam while the respondent in WP(C) No. 2019/2001 was appointed as Pro...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›