Guwahati Court August 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jidam Hiri Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-08-2002
I.A. Ansari, J. 1. By this application made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a Junior Inspector of Co-operative Societies (in short, 'JICs') in the office of the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Daporijo, P.O. and P.S. Daporijo, District Upper Subansiri, Arunachal Pradesh, has approached this Court with prayer to set aside and quash the order No. COOP(GEN)2/2001, dated 15.1.2002 (Annexure II to the writ petition) issued by the respondent No. 2, namely. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, whereby Shri L. Rigia, JICs has been appointed to function as Managing Director of Dapo Lamp Ltd., Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh, in place of the present petitioner.2. In a nutshell, petitioner's case runs thus : The petitioner was appointed in the year 1996, as a Junior Inspector of Co-operative Societies (JICs), whereas the private respondent No. 4 joined as JICs in the year 1997. The private respondent No....
State of Arunachal Pradesh Vs. Tayur Jampen and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-08-2002
I.A. Ansari, J.1. This reference under Regulation 30(1) of the Assam Frontier (Administration of Justice) Regulations, 1945, has arisen out of the judgment and order, dated 16.5.2001, passed by the learned Deputy Commissioner, West Siang District, Along, in Sessions Case No. GR.214/90, which arose out of Mechukha Police Station Case No. 18/90, convicting the accused, Tayor Jempen, under Section 304 (Part. I) and Section 436 of the IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and also to pay fine of Rs. 5,000 and in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a further period of one year. 2. The case of the prosecution, as unfolded at the trial, may, in brief, be stated as follows : On 12.09.1990, accused Tayor Jampen was staying at the house of his father-in-law, viz., deceased Tanya Kochung of Village Yorko, under Mechukha Police Station, West Siang district. Besides accused Tayor Jampen and the deceased, Smt. Yanne Jempen, wife of accused Tayor Jampen and t...
Medi Ram Dodum Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-07-2002
I.A. Ansari, J. 1. This is one of those very few cases in which, a former constitutional functionary has approached this Court by way of application made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking appropriate relief(s) against the alleged act(s) of omission committed by the Government, when the petitioner himself was a Cabinet Minister in the State Cabinet. 2. In a narrow compass, petitioner's case may be put thus : The petitioner was, during the year 1995, Minister of Horticulture in the Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Though as a Cabinet Minister, the petitioner was entitled to free-furnished government accommodation befitting his position and status, yet despite repeated requests made by him in this regard, the petitioner was not provided with such accommodation on the ground of non-availability of proper government accommodation. The petitioner had to, therefore, start residing in a Type-II government quarter in Sector-D, at Itanagar, which stood allotted to the wi...
Girindra Nath Gogoi Vs. Oil India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-05-2002
J.N. Sarma, J. 1. On 28.8.1961, petitioner was appointed as Production Practice Trainee in the Assam Oil Company and joined the service in such capacity. On 1.1.1962, petitioner was transferred to Oil India Limited in the same capacity. In the year 1981, he was promoted to the post of Assistant Production Engineer under Executive Grade-A. Thereafter, in the year 1983 he was again promoted to the post of Production Engineer under Executive Grade-B. In the year 1987. again he was promoted to the post of Senior Engineer Production under Executive Grade-C. In the year 1991, he was promoted to the post of Deputy Superintending Engineer (Production) under Executive Grade-C. On 22.6.1996, petitioner was promoted to the post of Superintending Engineer (Production) under Executive Grade-D, On July, 1996 he sought privilege leave from 5.8.1996 to 3.10.1996. Leave was granted by the competent authority. Before the aforesaid leave expired, he sought for extention of leave by 30 days and the same ...
Premoda Medhi and anr. Vs. Gauhati Roller Flour Mills Ltd. and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-02-2002
A.H. Saikia, J. 1. Heard Mr. A.K. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioners and also heard Mrs. M Hazarika, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The order dated 11.6.2002 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kamrup, Guwahati in Case No. 209 M/2002 under Section 144 Cr.PC is under challenge in this criminal revision. 3. The impugned order in which the legality and validity is questioned is extracted under :- 'ORDER Seen the petition filed'by one Sri Kishor Sarma supported by an affidavit and heard the learned advocate on behalf of the 1st party petitioner. I am satisfied that there is every possibility for serious and eminent breach of peace between the parties as well as public tranquility which may even lead to riot/affray concerning the land as mentioned in the schedule below and hence a proceeding U/S 144 Cr.P.C. is ordered to be drawn restraining the 2nd party members from entering into the disputed land with immediate effect and until further order. ...
State of Tripura Vs. Dilip Kumar Dey
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-02-2002
B.B. Deb, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. On a preliminary question of law, this appeal could be disposed of.3. This second appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure code has been filed by the appellant against the judgment passed by the learned District Judge, West Tripura Agartala in T.A. 17 of 1995 rejecting the prayer for condonation of delay filed by the appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act resulting in dismissal of the appeal being time barred.4. The present appellant preferred Title Appeal bearing No. 17 of 1995 on 7.6.1995 before the learned District Judge, West Tripura Agartala, being the First Appellate Court, against the judgment/ decree dated 15.12.1994 passed by the learned Munsiff, Agartala, Tripura in T.S. No. 15/90. Since there was delay of 4 months 10 days in preferring the First Appeal the appellant filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay. The learned District Judge, being the First ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›