Guwahati Court May 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md. Sirajul Haque Vs. State of Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-03-2002
B.Biswas, J. 1. The Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalbari in C.R. Case No. 541 of 1990 convicting the accused petitioner under Section 27 read with Section 18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1946 is in challenge in this appeal. The punishment imposed is RI for one year and fine of Rs. 500 with imprisonment for a further period of one month in default of payment thereof. 2. I have heard Mr. M. A. Laskar, Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and also Mr. S. K. N. Mahammad and Mr. K. Munir, learned Public Prosecutors for the State of Assam. 3. The Inspector of Drugs, Guwahati submitted a complaint before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalbari alleging that the petitioner had stored and exhibited medicine for sale in the premises of a Pharmacy under the name and style of 'M/s Santi Medical Store' at Kaplabari under Mukalmua Police Station without any valid licence in contravention of the aforesaid provisions of law. ...
Atik Miyu Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-02-2002
I.A. Ansari, J. 1. Challenging the legality, correctness and justification of the order, dated 28.12.2000, issued by respondent No. 1, namely. Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Public Works Department, Itanagar, according regular promotion to the respondent Nos. 4 and 5, namely, Tamar Nalo, Assistant Engineer (Civil), PWD, Itanagar and Nyajuin Padu, Assistant Engineer (Civil), PWD, Itanagar, with effect from 10.7.1981 and 25.7.1981 respectively, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking to get the order aforementioned quashed and to receive appropriate direction/s for maintaining original inter se seniority between the parties concerned. 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to this writ petition are as follows : The petitioner belongs to indigenous tribe of the State or Arunachal Pradesh. The petitioner, who holds a degree of Bachelor of Civil Engineering, was appointed as Assistant Engineer (Civil) in PWD department on 23.01.1991 and joined th...
Brij Kishore Prasad Vs. Cegat
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-01-2002
N.S. Singh, J. 1. In this Custom Reference Case No. 1 (SH) of 2000, the petitioner Shri Brij Kishore Prasad made a prayer for issuance of direction to the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, the respondent No. 1 herein to refer to this Court all the questions of law raised and referred to in the petition, available in relevant paragraph of Annexure 'B' arising out of the impugned judgment and order dated 13-3-2000 passed in Appeal No. C-191/96 under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962 and Rules made thereunder coupled with a prayer for quashing the entire proceedings and related orders passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) N.E.R., Shillong and the impugned judgment dated 13-3-2000 passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, respondent No. 1 herein. On the motion of the petitioner, this Court by an order dated 14-12-2000 issued notice upon the respondents to show cause as to why the respondents particularly, the Appellate Tribu...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›