Guwahati Court July 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Haralal Nath Shib
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-13-2001
1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is directed against the judgment/award dated 2.4.1996 passed by thelearned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, West Tripura, Agartala in T.S.(MACT) No. 159 of 1992 making an award of Rs. 1,15,000 being compensation to the sole respondent.2. The case leading to this appeal is that the respondent being the owner of his Maruti Van bearing No. TR 020208 got it insured with the appellant Insurance Company. During the validity of the insurance policy on 5.6.1992 the owner having valid driving licence while was driving the said vehicle met with an accident having dashed with a tree and as a result the owner driver sustained grievous injuries on different parts of his body. He received treatment initially at G.B. Hospital, Agartala and thereafter at SSKM Hospital, Kolkata. He filed the claim petition under Section 166 of the Act and after trial the Tribunal awarded compensation as stated above.3. Aggrieved, the Insurance Com...
Nirmalendu Debbarma Vs. State of Tripura and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-09-2001
B.B. Deb, J. 1. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order bearing No. F.6(42)-PWD/E/89(S) dated 20.4.1999 by which the petitioner's appointment to the post of Draftsman Grade-II was cancelled by the Engineer-in-Chief, PWD, Tripura, Agartala, respondent No. 2. 2. Briefly, the petitioner's case is that he joined service under the Public Works Department (shortly PWD) Govt. of Tripura on 29.6.1962 (post to which he was appointed has not been mentioned in the writ petition). Subsequently he was promoted to the post of Draftsman Grade-111 on 8.8.1990. He was further promoted to the post of Draftsman Grade-II and joined service on 10.8.1990. While the petitioner had completed almost nine years continuous service in the Grade, draftsman Grade-11, the respondent No.2, the Engineer-in-Chief, PWD, Govt. of Tripura issued the impugned order dated 20.4.1999 by which the petitioner's pr...
Sanjay R. Marak Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-06-2001
N.S. Singh, J. 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner questioned the validity of the impugned office order dated 16.2.1999 and modification of it vide letters/orders dated 28th June, 1999 and 10th March, 2000 as seen in the documents marked as Annexures 6 and 7 to the writ petition thus, extending the time of operation in respect of Weigh Bridge at Wageasi for a period of 3 (three) years with effect from 1.4.2000 to 31.3.2003 with a condition and payment of 25% extension fee on the last year's bid value amounting to Rs. 5,00,000 (Rupees five lakhs) only to and in favour of private respondent No. 5 namely, Smt. Tillavinter Marak by contending, inter alia, that the petitioner is a public spirited citizen of India and by profession he is a businessman dealing in various kinds of contract works and, as such, He is an interested party having a locus standi in the matter relating to the leasing and settlement of the weigh bridge of the respondents but, the respondent, the Garo Hills Aut...
Debithson D. Sangma Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-06-2001
N.S. Singh, J. 1. In this writ petitioner the petitioner has question the validity of the impugned order of discharged dated 7.10.1996 bearing DO No. 12865, issued by the Superintendent of Police, West Garo Hills, Tura, thus discharging the writ petitioner, UBC-454, Shri Bebiths on D. Sangma, from Police service w.e.f. 7.10.1996 as in Annexure IX, and the order of the appellate authority namely the Deputy Inspector General of Police Western Range, Tura, passed on 8.6.1999 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner as in Annexure XI to the writ petition by, contending inter alia, that the petitioner was most dedicated and sincere in his police service during his past 15 years on service career in the Meghalaya Police Department, but he has been discharged from service under the impugned order of discharge dated 7.10.1996 by the authority concerned without any justification on the charge that he had illegally collected money amounting to Rs. 100 to 200 from trucks corning from Mankachar ...
Mantu Narzary and anr. Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-05-2001
D. Biswas, J.1. Heard Mr. S.S. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioners and also Mr. P.K Goswami, learned senior counsel for the private respondents. Also heard Mr. P.K. Musahary, learned State counsel.2. During the course of argument it has been agreed that the petition in its entirety may be disposed of at this stage.3. The petitioners are working as Enforcement Checkers in the Transport Department, Govt. of Assam. The terms and conditions of their services are governed by the Assam Transport Service (Recruitment & Promotion to the Post of Assistant Enforcement Inspector) Orders, 1990. These Rules have been framed, by the Governor under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution. Rule 3 provides that 50% of the posts in the cadre of Assistant Enforcement Inspector shall be filled up by direct recruitment through competitive examination in the manner prescribed in para 5(2) and the remaining 50% of the posts shall be filled up by promotion from amongst the Enforcement Checkers.4....
Dilip Kumar Modak Vs. State of Tripura and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-04-2001
H.K.K. Singh, J. 1. Heard Mr. A.M. Lodh, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and also heard Mr. U.B. Saha, the learned senior Government Advocate assisted by Mr. T.D. Majumder, the learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents.2. This appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the CPC against the order dated 19.1.2001 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division No. 2, West Tripura, Agartala in suit No.M.S. 110/1999.3. Upon hearing the learned counsel of both sides it is found that the plaintiff, appellant herein filed a suit which was registered as M.S. 110/1999 in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Sr. Division No. 2, West Tripura, Agartala. The suit was for a claim of a sum of Rs. 2,41,396. Along with this suit the plaintiff also filed a separate application seeking leave of the court to file the suit as an indigent person under the provision of Order 33 of CPC. This application was registered as Misc.(P) No. 123 of 1999. It appears that the said...
Dipankar Roy Vs. Principal and Secretary, Public College of Commerce, ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jul-03-2001
B. Lamare, J.1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.N. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner was appointed in the year 1986 as part-time Lecturer in the Public College of Commerce, Dimapur. By Resolution of the Governing Body of the College held on 5.5.1990, the petitioner was given an option to work either as permanent staff or to quit the College. The petitioner gave his option that he was willing to serve the College as regular Lecturer on 1.6.1990. By another emergent meeting of the Governing Body of Public College of Commerce, Dimapur held on 30.7.1990, another Resolution No.5 was passed which reads as follows:-'Appointment of the following three part-time Lecturers shall be regularised on whole time basis to be effective from 1stAugust, 1990.1. Mrs. Manisha Sen - Deptt. of Economics.2. Shri D. Roy - Deptt. of Commerce.3. Shri S.N. Singh - Deptt. of Commerce.' 3. The petitioner thereafter, received a letter dated 4.12.1992 issue...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›