Guwahati Court August 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mira Roy and anr. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-03-2000
1. All the writ applications raise the common question of law and almost similar facts. These writ applications have been filed by 19 petitioners in all with the prayer to set aside the Memorandum dated 31.3.1999. Annexure - 11 (wrongly typed out as Annexurc -12 in the writ petitions). Annexure - 11 reads as follows :-'No. F.3(51) - DSWE /ESTT/97GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURADIRECTORATE OF SOCIAL WELFARE & SOCIAL EDUCATION AGARTALA: TRIPURA Dated, Agartala, the 31/3/1999 MEMO Shri/Smt. Juthika Bhattacharjee. Supervisor, ICDS was appointed on adhoc basis and his/her adhoc appointment is continued from time to time. As he/she was appointed on adhoc basis without following the selection process through TPSC. His/her adhoc appointment could not be regularised. Because of this, his/her adhoc appointment may discontinued at any time by theGovernment. The TPSC has issued Advertisement vide No.3/99 dated 17.3.1999 for the post of Supervisor, ICDS. The last date for submission of application is 17.4....
S. Liansonthang Guite and ors. Vs. the Secretary (Technical) Works, Go ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-02-2000
D.N. Chowdhury, J. 1. The legitimacy of the action of the Executive in the matter of payment of compensation for acquisition of land is the key question in this proceeding. The petitioners are the Chiefs of the respective Kuki villages situated within Churachandpur district of Manipur who are the owner of the village and the village land and other immovable properties attached to it. It is contended in the writ petition that the State authority proposed to acquire certain land comprised Suangdoh and Thuangtam Kuki Hill Villages owned and possessed by the petitioner No. 2 and petitioner No. 11 respectively for the purpose of construction of Guite Road. Notices were accordingly issued by the State Govt. and the petitioners put up their claim for compensation. While the matter rested at that stage by Office Memorandum No. 51/12/87-W(Pt) dated 19.4.1994 the Govt. of Manipur, Secretariat Works Department issued the instructions to all concerned communicating the Govt. decision on the mat...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›